2016
DOI: 10.5604/16652681.1198801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility and limitations of APRI and FIB4 to predict staging in a cohort of nonselected outpatients with hepatitis C

Abstract: In conclusion, use of the APRI or FIB4 markers for detection of hepatic fibrosis may be a viable alternative at referral centers for treatment of CHC in low- and middle-income countries. Despite relatively good accuracy, a significant number of patients could not be assessed by these methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FIB-4 has a better AUROC compared to APRI and is the preferred noninvasive fibrosis score to discriminate between F0-F2 and F3-F4. This is similar to results of other studies [21,22]. The majority of studies which involved 13Clabelled hepatic breath test substrates comprised heterogeneous patient groups with a variety of hepatic diseases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…FIB-4 has a better AUROC compared to APRI and is the preferred noninvasive fibrosis score to discriminate between F0-F2 and F3-F4. This is similar to results of other studies [21,22]. The majority of studies which involved 13Clabelled hepatic breath test substrates comprised heterogeneous patient groups with a variety of hepatic diseases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Although APRI and FIB‐4 have previously been shown to be useful to stage liver fibrosis, our results suggested that LSM was, at present, the most accurate noninvasive method for early detection of fibrosis in AIH. The lower performance of APRI and FIB‐4 for predicting severe fibrosis in AIH patients was due to, at least partly, higher aminotransferase levels in our patients than those from previous studies in which the patients of ALT more than two times ULN were excluded …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…It was published previously, that intermediate FIB-4 values of 1.45–3.25 have negative predictive value of 89% for excluding advanced fibrosis and patients in this range would require a liver biopsy to assess the fibrosis stage. Thirty to forty percent of patients have an indeterminate score, and in these cases, additional testing is needed[ 35 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%