2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2009.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utilisation du midazolam dans l’état de mal épileptique réfractaire de l’enfant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in accordance with previous literature, which highlight SE duration as a predictor of poor outcomes (31,32,35). We also identified that in our SRSE cohort, side effects from CI administration, such as respiratory failure and hypotension, were lower than expected based on prior reports (36)(37)(38). These findings may be related to ICD code underreporting once patients are intubated or receiving vasopressor agents, which may hinder our understanding of common complications in SRSE and warrants attention in clinical practice and future research studies.…”
Section: Sample Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These findings are in accordance with previous literature, which highlight SE duration as a predictor of poor outcomes (31,32,35). We also identified that in our SRSE cohort, side effects from CI administration, such as respiratory failure and hypotension, were lower than expected based on prior reports (36)(37)(38). These findings may be related to ICD code underreporting once patients are intubated or receiving vasopressor agents, which may hinder our understanding of common complications in SRSE and warrants attention in clinical practice and future research studies.…”
Section: Sample Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…[2][3][4] Our results are comparable to those reported in the literature assessing the use of midazolam for seizure control in the emergency setting and reporting success rates of 56 to 96.7%. 3,5,8,10,11,[13][14][15][16][17] To our knowledge, there are no studies comparing IV midazolam to either lorazepam or diazepam IV in the ED setting. Silbergleit and colleagues published a double-blind, randomized, noninferiority trial comparing the efficacy of IM midazolam to that of IV lorazepam: IM midazolam was at least as safe and effective as IV lorazepam.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Multiple studies have proven that midazolam is at least as effective as diazepam in terms of safety and risk of recurrence, with the advantage of providing a faster initiation of treatment, leading to more rapid seizure cessation. 3,5,8,10,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Midazolam has emerged as a highly efficacious drug in the treatment of impending SE, with several routes of administration exhibiting high bioavailability. 19 In a recent article proposing evidence-based and expert consensus practice guidelines, the Neurocritical Care Society lists midazolam as Class I, Level A for the emergent treatment of SE, as Class IIB, Level B for urgent treatment (continuous infusion), and as Class IIa, Level B for refractory treatment using the evidence rating system of the American Heart Association. )…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%