2004
DOI: 10.1080/jmf.16.2.134.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uterine artery Doppler and mid-trimester maternal plasma homocysteine in subsequent pre-eclampsia

Abstract: Mid-trimester maternal plasma homocysteine concentration is not elevated in women who developed pre-eclampsia even in those at high risk defined by abnormal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, other studies detected no differences in midtrimester maternal circulating level of homocysteine between women who developed preeclampsia and normal pregnant women 15,[18][19][20] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In contrast, other studies detected no differences in midtrimester maternal circulating level of homocysteine between women who developed preeclampsia and normal pregnant women 15,[18][19][20] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This relationship has been shown in early pregnancy (Cotter et al 2001), in the second trimester (Sorensen et al 1999;Hogg et al 2000), and in the third trimester of pregnancy (Sanchez et al 2001). However, it has been suggested that midtrimester plasma homocysteine concentrations in asymptomatic women are not predictive of the subsequent development of preeclampsia (Hietala et al 2001;Raijmakers et al 2001;D'Anna et al 2004;Yu et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Earlier, a case-control study reported increased homocysteine levels at early midtrimester in women with subsequent severe and non-severe pre-eclampsia (Cotter et al, 2003). In contrast, other studies detected no difference in midtrimester homocysteine serum levels between women who developed pre-eclampsia and controls (Yu et al, 2004;Onalan et al, 2006;D'Anna et al, 2004). The contradictory results undermine the potential of homocysteine as a marker for subsequent pre-eclampsia.…”
Section: Homocysteinementioning
confidence: 87%