2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.05.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uterine adenosarcoma in a boy with persistent müllerian duct syndrome: first reported case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In human patients, because surgical removal of the MD derivatives is often carried out when surgery in boys is also necessary for cryptorchid, nonpalpable testes and the vast majority of PMDS patients have mutations in MIS signaling components (8), later consequences of MD retention due to dysregulated Wnt/β-catenin signaling will be difficult to discern (37,38). However, there is one reported case of uterine adenosarcoma (39) and another of clear cell adenocarcinoma (40) in human patients with PMDS. We did not observe evidence of neoplastic transformation in the retained MD tissue of these mice by 3 mo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In human patients, because surgical removal of the MD derivatives is often carried out when surgery in boys is also necessary for cryptorchid, nonpalpable testes and the vast majority of PMDS patients have mutations in MIS signaling components (8), later consequences of MD retention due to dysregulated Wnt/β-catenin signaling will be difficult to discern (37,38). However, there is one reported case of uterine adenosarcoma (39) and another of clear cell adenocarcinoma (40) in human patients with PMDS. We did not observe evidence of neoplastic transformation in the retained MD tissue of these mice by 3 mo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malignancy can also develop from müllerian duct remnants. Adenocarcinoma of müllerian remnants and uterine adenosarcoma are reported in these patients [Romero et al, 2005;Thiel et al, 2005]. Malignancy was not detected in our patients neither at presentation nor during 6 and 4 years of followup, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…Earlier studies [8,12] opined that while removing the müllerian remnants, there is a high probability of damage to vas deferens and its blood supply with no disadvantage of conversion into malignancy, so they should not be removed. Thiel and Erhard reported the death of a 14-year-old boy with PMDS, due to metastasis of adenosarcoma arising from the müllerian remnant [14]. Romero et al reported a 39-year-old man who developed adenocarcinoma of endocervical origin, arising from the müllerian remnant [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%