2020
DOI: 10.1214/20-ejp485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UST branches, martingales, and multiple SLE(2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For N = 1, the formula for the unique connectivity weight is (22); for N = 2, the formula is (24); for N = 3, these formulas are ( 28) and (32); and for N = 4, these formulas are (35), (39) and (46). In addition, we find an explicit formula (56) for the 'rainbow connectivity weight' (section 2.5), generating a multiple-SLE κ process in which the boundary arcs join the 2N marked points on the real axis to form a 'rainbow' [4,42] in the upper half-plane (figure 19). (Reference [35] obtains an alternative explicit formula for the rainbow connectivity weight using the 'spin-chain Coulomb gas correspondence,' previously developed in [34].)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For N = 1, the formula for the unique connectivity weight is (22); for N = 2, the formula is (24); for N = 3, these formulas are ( 28) and (32); and for N = 4, these formulas are (35), (39) and (46). In addition, we find an explicit formula (56) for the 'rainbow connectivity weight' (section 2.5), generating a multiple-SLE κ process in which the boundary arcs join the 2N marked points on the real axis to form a 'rainbow' [4,42] in the upper half-plane (figure 19). (Reference [35] obtains an alternative explicit formula for the rainbow connectivity weight using the 'spin-chain Coulomb gas correspondence,' previously developed in [34].)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Our results show that such expressions may reduce to fewer terms, sometimes even a single term, for small N. Further, obtaining results for rational values of κ with quantum group methods is possible by taking the limit of the quantum group results but involves many cancelling terms, and thus appears complicated. See [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] for these and related results from quantum group and other methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, define τ δn to be the first time when η δn 1 hits (x δn 2 x δn 2N ) and τ to be the first time when η 1 hits (x 2 x 2N ). By properly adjusting the coupling (as in [HLW20, Proof of Theorem 4.2, Equation (4.25)]; see also [Kar20,GW20]), we may assume lim n→∞ τ δn = τ almost surely. Now, denote by (W t , t ≥ 0) the driving function of η1 and by (g t , t ≥ 0) the corresponding conformal maps.…”
Section: Convergence Of the Observablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dmitry Chelkak is grateful to Stanislav Smirnov for explaining the ideas of [24] during several conversations dating back to 2009-2014. We want to thank Michel Bauer, Konstantin Izyurov and Kalle Kytölä for valuable comments and for encouraging us to write this paper; Alex Karrila for useful discussions of his research [13,14]; Chengyang Shao for discussions during his spring 2017 internship at the ENS [31]; and Mikhail Skopenkov for a feedback, which in particular included pointing out a mess at the end of the proof of [8, Theorem 3.13]. This proof is sketched in Section 3 with a necessary correction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%