2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

USP12 translocation maintains interferon antiviral efficacy by inhibiting CBP acetyltransferase activity

Abstract: CREB-binding protein (CBP) participates in numerous transcription events. However, cellintrinsic inhibitors of CBP are poorly defined. Here, we found that cellular USP12 interacts with the HAT domain of CBP and inhibits CBP's acetyltransferase activity. Interestingly, USP12 positively regulates interferon (IFN) antiviral signaling independently of its deubiquitinase activity. Furthermore, we found that in IFN signaling USP12 translocates from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. The decrease in cytoplasmic USP12 faci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we found that Poly6 treatment, capable of exerting anti-HIV-1 effects, leads to IFN-I production in DCs, the DC2.4 cell line, and BMDCs via mitochondrial stress-mediated cytosolic exposure of mitochondrial DNA ( Figure 1 B and Figure S1C–E ). Increasing evidence has shown that various drugs targeting molecules that modulate host acetylation status, such as histone acetylation transferases (HATs) or histone deacetylases (HDACs), affect mitochondrial homeostasis or metabolism [ 19 , 35 , 36 ] or enhance IFN-I production via acetylation modification of phosphorylated-signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (p-STAT-1) [ 37 ] or IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) [ 38 ]. However, the links between cellular modulation and induced IFN-I production found in Poly6-treated DCs require further elucidation in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we found that Poly6 treatment, capable of exerting anti-HIV-1 effects, leads to IFN-I production in DCs, the DC2.4 cell line, and BMDCs via mitochondrial stress-mediated cytosolic exposure of mitochondrial DNA ( Figure 1 B and Figure S1C–E ). Increasing evidence has shown that various drugs targeting molecules that modulate host acetylation status, such as histone acetylation transferases (HATs) or histone deacetylases (HDACs), affect mitochondrial homeostasis or metabolism [ 19 , 35 , 36 ] or enhance IFN-I production via acetylation modification of phosphorylated-signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (p-STAT-1) [ 37 ] or IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) [ 38 ]. However, the links between cellular modulation and induced IFN-I production found in Poly6-treated DCs require further elucidation in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, USP12 positively regulates IFN antiviral signaling independently of its deubiquitinase activity. Upon IFN treatment, USP12 accumulates in the nucleus, blocks the CREB-binding protein-induced acetylation of p-STAT1, and thus inhibits the dephosphorylation effects of TCPTP on p-STAT1, which ultimately maintains the nuclear p-STAT1 levels and IFN antiviral efficacy ( 114 ).…”
Section: Dubs Regulate Host Antiviral Activity Independently Of Their Protease Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 Liu and colleagues demonstrate that Type 1 IFN signaling stimulates the translocation of USP12 from cytoplasm to the nucleus, that blocks the acetylation effect of CREB-binding protein (CBP) in nucleus. 54 Therefore, in radioresistant cancer cells, aberrant IFNs signaling reduces the acetylation of STAT1 and inhibits the dephosphorylation of STAT1, leading to the high expression of STAT1. 53,54 Consequently, balance between dynamic phosphorylation and acetylation of IFN-dependent STAT1 signaling regulates cancer response to RT.…”
Section: Intrinsic Determinants In Tumor Radioresistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 Therefore, in radioresistant cancer cells, aberrant IFNs signaling reduces the acetylation of STAT1 and inhibits the dephosphorylation of STAT1, leading to the high expression of STAT1. 53,54 Consequently, balance between dynamic phosphorylation and acetylation of IFN-dependent STAT1 signaling regulates cancer response to RT. The interactions of STAT1 and ISGs' roles in radiation-induced cell death are still unknown in various cancers.…”
Section: Intrinsic Determinants In Tumor Radioresistancementioning
confidence: 99%