Bubbles in Food 2 2008
DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-891127-59-5.50026-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Ultrasound to Probe Nucleation and Growth of Bubbles in Bread Dough and to Examine the Resulting Cellular Structure of Bread Crumb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that the attenuation coefficient increases with the amount of gas in the dough, so that the bubbles make a significant contribution to the dough's attenuation. As discussed by Scanlon and others (2008), in this long wavelength regime we expect an approximately square root dependence on φ for the attenuation coefficient at low volume fractions of bubbles. The lines in Figure 6 trace a k s φ 0.5 dependence, where k s is an adjustable parameter that varies according to the amount of shortening in the dough; its value was determined by minimizing the difference between model and experimental attenuations of the air‐mixed doughs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is clear that the attenuation coefficient increases with the amount of gas in the dough, so that the bubbles make a significant contribution to the dough's attenuation. As discussed by Scanlon and others (2008), in this long wavelength regime we expect an approximately square root dependence on φ for the attenuation coefficient at low volume fractions of bubbles. The lines in Figure 6 trace a k s φ 0.5 dependence, where k s is an adjustable parameter that varies according to the amount of shortening in the dough; its value was determined by minimizing the difference between model and experimental attenuations of the air‐mixed doughs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Nevertheless, the qualitative form of the v against φ relationship in Figure 5 indicates that the compressibility of bubbles dominates the velocity result for dough at this lower frequency and the effect that shortening has on the dough matrix is only manifest as a slight change in the velocity of the dough. This result would not be expected at all ultrasonic frequencies (Elmehdi and others 2005; Leroy and others 2008; Scanlon and others 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The ultrasonic phase velocity (v) and attenuation coefficient (α) as a function of frequency are displayed for the different salt concentrations in Figure 2A and B, respectively. The frequency-dependent peaks in both v and α are indicative of a low-frequency resonance arising from the bubbles entrained into the dough during mixing (Leroy et al 2008a;Scanlon et al 2008), because of the strong pulsations (periodic expansion and contraction) of the bubbles. The frequency-dependent peaks in both v and α are indicative of a low-frequency resonance arising from the bubbles entrained into the dough during mixing (Leroy et al 2008a;Scanlon et al 2008), because of the strong pulsations (periodic expansion and contraction) of the bubbles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise information on the ultrasonic velocity (even at one frequency) of most of these components is lacking, so that it is difficult to accurately assess acoustic impedances to determine whether any of these components can be readily discriminated by ultrasound. However, a considerable amount of research has been performed on ultrasonic investigations of scattering from bubbles in liquids (Leighton 1994; Leroy et al 2002, 2008b, 2009b; Tatibouet et al 2002), from bubbles in soft solids (Meyer et al 1958; Strybulevych et al 2007; Leroy et al 2009a, 2011), and from bubbles in dough (Elmehdi et al 2005; Leroy et al 2008a; Scanlon et al 2008). The large acoustic impedance mismatch between the dough matrix and the bubbles it contains ( Z bubble ∼ 0.0004 Z doughmatrix ) means that ultrasound is effectively scattered by bubbles within the dough.…”
Section: Ultrasound As a Structure Elucidation Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%