2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the venous angle as a pressure reservoir to retrogradely fill the subclavian lymphatic trunk with contrast agent for lymphatic mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous experiments, a proof of concept for retrograde lymphatic filling was provided [72,77]. However, many variables play a role in this process and a combination of adaptations to the current experimental approaches is still required to optimise the retrograde filling methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on previous experiments, a proof of concept for retrograde lymphatic filling was provided [72,77]. However, many variables play a role in this process and a combination of adaptations to the current experimental approaches is still required to optimise the retrograde filling methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lymphatic valves withstood pressures of up to 55 mmHg, while no such pressures were tolerated by the lymphatic walls or the venous walls. Therefore, even though a proof of concept was provided for retrograde lymphatic injections, the experimental set up needed to be optimised further to allow a significant amount of retrograde filling of the subclavian lymphatic trunk [77].…”
Section: Techniques To Characterise Breast Lymphatic Anatomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like the ESTRO and PROCAB guidelines, our PCP specific guidelines are primarily based on the vasculature, because the lymphatics are located in close proximity to the veins 13,14,21 . Vessel based guidelines are less patient and position dependent, compared to bony landmarks as reference points 13,14,17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%