Adenosine modulates the immune system and inhibits inflammation via reduction of cytokine biosynthesis and neutrophil functions. Drugs able to prevent adenosine catabolism could represent an innovative strategy to treat inflammatory bowel disorders. In this study, the effects of 4-amino-2-(2-hydroxy-1-decyl)pyrazole [3,4-d]pyrimidine (APP; novel adenosine deaminase inhibitor), erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine hydrochloride (EHNA; standard adenosine deaminase inhibitor), and dexamethasone were tested in rats with colitis induced by 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (DNBS). DNBS-treated animals received APP (5, 15, or 45 mol/kg), EHNA (10, 30, or 90 mol/kg), or dexamethasone (0.25 mol/kg) i.p. for 7 days starting 1 day before colitis induction. DNBS caused bowel inflammation associated with decrease in food intake and body weight. Animals treated with APP or EHNA, but not dexamethasone, displayed greater food intake and weight gain than inflamed rats. Colitis induced increment in spleen weight, which was counteracted by all test drugs. DNBS administration was followed by macroscopic and microscopic inflammatory colonic alterations, which were ameliorated by APP, EHNA, or dexamethasone. In DNBS-treated rats, colonic myeloperoxidase, malondialdehyde, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-␣ levels as well as plasma TNF-␣ and interleukin-6 were increased. All test drugs lowered these phlogistic indexes. Inflamed colonic tissues displayed an increment of inducible nitric-oxide synthase mRNA, which was unaffected by APP or EHNA, but reduced by dexamethasone. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression was unaffected by DNBS or test drugs. These findings indicate that 1) inhibition of adenosine deaminase results in a significant attenuation of intestinal inflammation and 2) the novel compound APP is more effective than EHNA in reducing systemic and intestinal inflammatory alterations.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder which leads to severe movement impairment; however, Parkinsonian patients frequently suffer from gastrointestinal (GI) problems which at present are poorly understood, scarcely investigated, and lack an effective cure. Traditionally, PD is attributed to the loss of mesencephalic dopamine-containing neurons; nonetheless, additional nuclei, such as the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve and specific central noradrenergic nuclei, are now identified as targets of PD. While the effects of PD on the somatic motor systems are well characterized, the influence on the digestive system still needs to be clarified. Recent findings demonstrate the occurrence of pathological alterations within peripheral neuronal networks in the GI tract of Parkinsonian patients. However, it remains unclear whether a real cell loss occurs, and whether this happens specifically for a subclass of autonomic neurons or if it reflects the sole loss of autonomic nerves. This review summarizes the neurochemical and morphological changes which might be responsible for impaired GI motility. Moreover, we focus on the experimental models to reproduce the altered digestive system of Parkinsonian patients since an experimental model able to mimic such features of PD is required. In the last part of the manuscript, we suggest potential therapeutic targets.
Adenosine modulates immune/inflammatory reactions. This study investigates the expression of adenosine deaminase in the inflamed colon, the effects of adenosine deaminase inhibitors on established colitis, and the recruitment of adenosine receptors by endogenous adenosine after adenosine deaminase blockade. Adenosine deaminase expression was determined by Western blot. The effects of 4-amino-2-(2-hydroxy-1-decyl)pyrazole [3,4-d]pyrimidine (APP; a novel adenosine deaminase inhibitor), erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl)adenine (EHNA; a reference adenosine deaminase inhibitor), dexamethasone, and selective adenosine receptor antagonists were tested in rats with 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic acid-induced colitis. Systemic (food intake, body and spleen weight) and colonic [macroscopic/microscopic damage, tumor necrosis factor-␣ (TNF-␣), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and malondialdehyde (MDA)] inflammatory parameters were assessed. Test drugs were administered intraperitoneally for 6 days, starting at day 5 from colitis induction. Adenosine deaminase was detected in normal colon, and its expression was increased in inflamed tissues. Colitis was associated with decreased food intake and body weight, augmented spleen weight, and increased levels of colonic TNF-␣, IL-6, and MDA. APP or EHNA, but not dexamethasone, improved food intake and body weight. APP, EHNA, and dexamethasone counteracted the increments of spleen weight, ameliorated macroscopic and microscopic indexes of inflammation, and reduced TNF-␣, IL-6, and MDA levels. The beneficial effects of APP and EHNA on inflammatory parameters were prevented by the pharmacological blockade of A 2A or A 3 receptors, but not A 1 or A 2B . The present results show that: 1) bowel inflammation is associated with an enhanced adenosine deaminase expression; and 2) the anti-inflammatory actions of adenosine deaminase inhibitors against chronic established colitis depend on the sparing of endogenous adenosine, leading to enhanced A 2A and A 3 receptor activation.
The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be associated with severe adverse digestive effects. In clinical settings, proton pump inhibitors have proven to be effective in preventing and healing NSAID-induced gastroduodenal lesions. The present study investigates the mechanisms of protection afforded by pantoprazole against gastric injury induced by different NSAIDs in rats. Animals were orally treated with indomethacin (100 micromol/kg), diclofenac (60 micromol/kg), piroxicam (150 micromol/kg) or ketoprofen (150 micromol/kg). Thirty minutes before NSAIDs, animals received pantoprazole 6 or 60 micromol/kg orally. Four hours after NSAIDs, the following parameters were assessed: histomorphometric evaluation of gastric mucosal damage; gastric mucosal levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO), malondialdehyde (MDA), reduced glutathione as an index of non-proteic sulfhydryl compounds (GSH), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2); mucosal cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 (COX-1, COX-2) mRNA expression by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Separate experiments were carried out to assay the effects of pantoprazole on gastric acid secretion in pylorus-ligated rats. The in vitro influence of pantoprazole (1-10 microM) on the oxidation of low density lipoproteins (LDLs) induced by copper sulphate was also examined. All NSAIDs elicited mucosal necrotic lesions associated with neutrophil infiltration and reduction of PGE2 levels. Increments of MPO and MDA contents, as well as a decrease in GSH levels, were detected in the gastric mucosa of indomethacin-, piroxicam- or ketoprofen-treated animals. Indomethacin enhanced mucosal COX-2 expression, while not affecting COX-1. At the oral dose of 6 micromol/kg pantoprazole did not affect NSAID-induced mucosal damage, whereas at 60 micromol/kg it markedly reduced injuries provoked by all test NSAIDs. Pantoprazole 60 micromol/kg also reversed the effects of NSAIDs on MPO, MDA, and GSH mucosal contents, without interfering with the decrease in PGE2 levels or indomethacin-induced COX-2 expression. However, at both doses, pantoprazole inhibited acid secretion in pylorus-ligated rats. Furthermore, pantoprazole concentration dependently reduced the in vitro oxidation of LDLs. Our results suggest that besides inhibiting acid secretion, the protection afforded by pantoprazole against NSAID-induced gastric damage depends on a reduction in mucosal oxidative injury, which may also account for an increment of sulfhydryl radical mucosal bioavailability. It is also suggested that pantoprazole does not influence the down-regulation of gastric prostaglandin production associated with NSAID treatment.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce intestinal mucosal damage, but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. The present study investigated the effects of celecoxib, etoricoxib, indomethacin, and diclofenac on small bowel integrity in rats. Male rats were treated orally with test drugs for 14 days. Animals were processed for assessment of blood hemoglobin levels and hepatic mitochondrial functions, microscopic evaluation of small intestinal damage, Western blot analysis of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 (COX-1, COX-2) expression, and assay of malondialdehyde (MDA), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and prostaglandin E 2 (PGE 2 ) levels in small intestine. Indomethacin and diclofenac decreased blood hemoglobin levels, whereas etoricoxib and celecoxib were without effects. Celecoxib caused a lower degree of intestinal damage in comparison with the other test drugs. Indomethacin and diclofenac, but not etoricoxib or celecoxib, reduced intestinal PGE 2 levels. Test drugs did not modify intestinal COX-1 expression, although they enhanced COX-2, with the exception of celecoxib, which downregulated COX-2. Indomethacin, diclofenac, and etoricoxib altered mitochondrial respiratory parameters, although celecoxib was without effects. Indomethacin or diclofenac increased MDA and MPO levels in both jejunum and ileum. In the jejunum, etoricoxib or celecoxib did not modify such parameters, whereas in the ileum, etoricoxib, but not celecoxib, increased both MDA and MPO levels. These findings suggest that nonselective NSAIDs and etoricoxib can induce enteropathy through a topic action, whereas celecoxib lacks relevant detrimental actions. The selectivity profile of COX-1/COX-2 inhibition by test drugs and the related effects on prostaglandin production do not appear to play a major role in the pathogenesis of enteropathy.
This review analyzes GI alterations from a pathological perspective to assess whether the enteric nervous system (ENS) mirrors the neuropathology described in the CNS. We discuss the potential mechanisms that lead to the onset and spread of neurodegeneration within the gut, from the gut to the brain, and vice versa.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.