2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2004.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using T–Z plots as a graphical method to infer lithological variations from growth strata

Abstract: The 'T-Z plot' method consists of plotting the throw of sedimentary horizons across a growth fault versus their depth in the hanging wall. This method has been initially developed for the analysis of growth fault kinematics from seismic data. A brief analytical examination of such plots shows that they can also provide valuable information about the evolution of fault topography. When growth is a continuous process, stages of topography creation (fault scarp) and filling (of the space available in the hanging-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10) covering a broad range of fault sizes, orientations and geographic locations were selected for fault throw analysis. We examine fault throw variations with depth (T-z), although to aid in data comparison of faults across different depth ranges we plot fault throw against the age (T-a) of the offset horizon, to quantify fault growth histories (e.g., Mansfield & Cartwright, 1996;Castelltort et al, 2004;Hongxing & Anderson, 2007;Baudon & Cartwright, 2008;. The morphology of both T-z and T-a profiles may reflect: (i) continued growth of a single, unconstrained fault that does not breach the surface (i.e.…”
Section: Timing Of Faultingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10) covering a broad range of fault sizes, orientations and geographic locations were selected for fault throw analysis. We examine fault throw variations with depth (T-z), although to aid in data comparison of faults across different depth ranges we plot fault throw against the age (T-a) of the offset horizon, to quantify fault growth histories (e.g., Mansfield & Cartwright, 1996;Castelltort et al, 2004;Hongxing & Anderson, 2007;Baudon & Cartwright, 2008;. The morphology of both T-z and T-a profiles may reflect: (i) continued growth of a single, unconstrained fault that does not breach the surface (i.e.…”
Section: Timing Of Faultingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As vertical displacement accumulates on a fault, the strata forming the sedimentary growth sequence are associated with increasing vertical offsets with depth. In contrast to gravity‐driven faults for which vertical displacement may be continuous over a variety of time intervals [ Castelltort et al , 2004; Pochat et al , 2009], on crustal faults that accumulate elastic strain and do not creep aseismically, all vertical throw is the sum of coseismic displacements and any potential postseismic slip that may last weeks to years after earthquakes. The progressively older layers in tectonic growth sequences have, therefore, been displaced by a larger number of earthquakes compared to the younger layers.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Submarine Fault Growth Sequences Highmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, bedload deposition of sands tends to fill the topographic lows before the highs. Castelltort et al (2004b) have proposed that, if fault displacement is treated as a continuous process on the scale of depositional cycles, the slope variations on a Th-z plot may be interpreted as faultinduced topography variations which can be in turn directly related to changes of the sedimentary dynamics, as in the case of alternating sand and shale deposition. In their work, were presented the interpretation of a Th-z plots with the two end-members ''fill-to-the-top'' model ( Fig.…”
Section: Determining Fault Kinematics From Growth Strata: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a) and ''variable displacement/topography'' or ''fault scarp'' model ( Fig. 2b) (Castelltort et al, 2004b).…”
Section: Determining Fault Kinematics From Growth Strata: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%