2022
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2022.2035207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Support Vector Machines for Facet Partitioning in Multidimensional Scaling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shepard diagram is a scatterplot with observed distances on the Y-axis and configuration distances on the X-axis. By looking at the Shepard diagram and the pseudo-R 2 statistics, which is an index similar to the determination coefficient in regression analysis, the goodness of fit between the observed distances and the configuration distances can be observed (Shepard, 1962;Özdamar, 2004;Yiğit, 2007;Gündüz, 2011;Mair et al, 2016).…”
Section: Multidimensional Scaling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shepard diagram is a scatterplot with observed distances on the Y-axis and configuration distances on the X-axis. By looking at the Shepard diagram and the pseudo-R 2 statistics, which is an index similar to the determination coefficient in regression analysis, the goodness of fit between the observed distances and the configuration distances can be observed (Shepard, 1962;Özdamar, 2004;Yiğit, 2007;Gündüz, 2011;Mair et al, 2016).…”
Section: Multidimensional Scaling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These analyses were conducted in R, using the smacof package (de Leeuw & Mair, 2009 ). The fit of the resulting solution to the data was conducted on the basis of permutation tests and analysis of the compatibility of individuals and values to the solution (Mair et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used multidimensional scaling (MDS) with the smacof R package (Version 2.1-1; de Leeuw & Mair, 2009) to visualize the estimated networks (see Jones et al, 2018, for a tutorial), representing nodes with stronger connections as closer in the visualization. The accuracy of the MDS layout was assessed using reported stress-1 values of the MDS fit (Mair et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%