Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2006.528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Speech Acts to Categorize Email and Identify Email Genres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cohen, Carvalho, & Mitchell, 2004), on the other hand, do use e-mail data (researcher generated), but they annotate speech acts at the message rather than at the utterance level. Message-rather than utterance-level annotation is also preferred by Leuski (2005) and Goldstein and Sabin (2006). We chose to annotate at the utterance level for two reasons.…”
Section: Speech Act Identification and Nlpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cohen, Carvalho, & Mitchell, 2004), on the other hand, do use e-mail data (researcher generated), but they annotate speech acts at the message rather than at the utterance level. Message-rather than utterance-level annotation is also preferred by Leuski (2005) and Goldstein and Sabin (2006). We chose to annotate at the utterance level for two reasons.…”
Section: Speech Act Identification and Nlpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers on digital document genres demonstrate the variety of ways research issues in electronic document management, organizational communication, document production and use, Web structuring, information retrieval, human-computer interaction, and e-democracy can benefit from and be informed by a genre approach (e.g., Bergquist & Ljungberg, 1999;Goldstein & Sabin, 2006;Karjalainen et al, 2000;Rehm, 2002;Roussinov, Crowston, Nilan, Kwasnik, Liu, & Cai, 2001;Saebø & Päivärinta, 2005;Shepherd & Watters, 1998;Toms & Campbell, 1999;Tyrväinen & Päivärinta, 1999;Watters & Shepherd, 1997;Yates, Orlikowski, & Rennecker, 1997;Yates & Sumner, 1997). Many of these studies are helpful because they illustrate the depth and social and humanistic rationale with which classic LIS research topics can be approached, a depth and rationale some topics may not yet have had but nevertheless have strongly needed.…”
Section: Genre In Library and Information Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intent was identified with help of a small ontology of email acts, where the main actions were "request," "propose," "amend," "commit," "deliver," and the subjects of these actions were "information," "meeting," "data," and so forth. Goldstein and Sabin (2006) took a broader look at the email tasks and defined 12 email genres according to their task, including not only the familiar directives, commitments, and requests for information but also expression of feelings, document forwarding, and advertising and spam. Lampert, Dale, and Paris (2008a) added details to the analysis of requests and commitments in workplace email.…”
Section: When Will the Rest Of It Come?mentioning
confidence: 99%