2011
DOI: 10.6027/tn2011-506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using sludge on arable land - effect based levels and long-term accumulation for certain organic pollutants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter was based on the mathematical relationships described in the European Chemicals Bureau Technical Guidance Document (TGD) on Risk Assessment (ECB 2003) and commonly used in RA studies of land application of sewage sludge (VKM 2009;Diana et al 2011;Sternbeck et al 2013). The USEtox models were used to obtain characterisation factors (CFs), which were then applied to the emissions of chemical contaminants resulting from the application of sludge to agricultural land.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The latter was based on the mathematical relationships described in the European Chemicals Bureau Technical Guidance Document (TGD) on Risk Assessment (ECB 2003) and commonly used in RA studies of land application of sewage sludge (VKM 2009;Diana et al 2011;Sternbeck et al 2013). The USEtox models were used to obtain characterisation factors (CFs), which were then applied to the emissions of chemical contaminants resulting from the application of sludge to agricultural land.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent risk assessment studies in the Nordic countries concluded that the application of sewage sludge to agricultural land generally constitutes a low risk to consumers (Diana et al 2011;Sternbeck et al 2013;VKM 2009). Yet, there has been considerable opposition against the practice of land application.…”
Section: Sensitivity Towards Assumptions and Problem Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations