Using Skype as an Alternative for Residency Selection Interviews

Abstract

Background Residency interviews can place significant time and financial burdens on applicants. Objective To determine whether the use of Skype as a screening tool during interview season in a family medicine residency is cost-effective and time-efficient for the applicant and the residency program. Methods We surveyed 2 groups of medical students during interviews for our family medicine program. Thirty-two students were interviewed via our face-to-face, traditional interview (TI) process, and 10 students, the second group, who did not meet the program's standard interview selection criteria for TI, underwent our Skype interview (SI) process. Results Using an unpaired t test, we found that the applicants' costs of an SI were significantly less than a TI, $566 (95% confidence interval [CI] $784–$349, P < .001). Direct cash savings plus indirect salary savings to the program were $5,864, with a time savings of 7 interview days. Three of the applicants who were participants in the SI limb of the study were in our final rank order list. Conclusions For interviewing in family medicine residencies, use of Skype may be a cost-effective and time-efficient screening tool for both the applicant and the program. Alternate uses of SI may include the time-sensitive, postmatch Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program.

How do people with refractory irritable bowel syndrome perceive hypnotherapy: Qualitative study protocol

“…The interview will either be in-person or conducted via a real-time electronic visual communications platform (video call) such as Skype [91]. Interviews via video calling have a number of theoretical advantages including financial savings [92], particularly in travel and related environmental benefits [93]. However, the primary advantage for this study was to capitalise on potential recruitment blooms, in which large numbers of potential candidates all volunteer simultaneously but are at high risk of loss of interest, a phenomenon which internet-based recruitment, with its ability to reach large numbers of people over a wide area, may generate.…”

Impromptu Response to Adverse Weather: One School’s Successful Application of Digital Interviewing for Medical School Admissions

“…Winter Storm Jonas was the impetus for the use of FaceTime interviews at the WVU SOM, and the interview process was successful for medical school recruiting. Although not previously reported for medical school recruiting, the use of digital interviewing has already been reported to be successful in the recruiting of residents and/or fellows in the fields of Pediatrics, Family Medicine, Anesthesiology, Urology and Gastroenterology (Nield et al, 2013;Edje et al, 2013;Vadi et al, 2016;Shah et al, 2012;Daram et al, 2014). We believe this is the first case study report about the successful use of FaceTime interviewing at the medical school level, and it may encourage admissions officials to expand the use of this modality in recruitment.…”

Residency Interviews in the 21st Century

“…2 Another study estimated that WBVC interviews saved applicants anywhere from $349 to $784 and saved the program $586 per applicant. 3 Furthermore, a study that randomized applicants to Skype versus traditional on-site interviews showed that applicants and faculty favored using WBVC as an adjunct to on-site interviews and that applicants required significantly less time away from medical school when WBVCs were used. 4 This study did confirm that, as expected, participants consider the traditional on-site interview to be more effective than virtual ones.…”