2000
DOI: 10.1897/1551-5028(2000)019<0151:ussttc>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Single-Species Toxicity Tests, Community-Level Responses, and Toxicity Identification Evaluations to Investigate Effluent Impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In situ bioassays previously have been deployed that use cladocerans as test organisms and have successfully detected toxic impacts in rivers [15–19]. Cladocerans adapt well to deployment in the field and are suitable as test organisms because survival rates in uncontaminated conditions are frequently greater than 85% for C. dubia [15] and greater than 90% for D. magna [16]. However, most in situ bioassays that use cladocerans have used lethality as an endpoint [15,16,18], which may not be the most sensitive endpoint to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In situ bioassays previously have been deployed that use cladocerans as test organisms and have successfully detected toxic impacts in rivers [15–19]. Cladocerans adapt well to deployment in the field and are suitable as test organisms because survival rates in uncontaminated conditions are frequently greater than 85% for C. dubia [15] and greater than 90% for D. magna [16]. However, most in situ bioassays that use cladocerans have used lethality as an endpoint [15,16,18], which may not be the most sensitive endpoint to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cladocerans adapt well to deployment in the field and are suitable as test organisms because survival rates in uncontaminated conditions are frequently greater than 85% for C. dubia [15] and greater than 90% for D. magna [16]. However, most in situ bioassays that use cladocerans have used lethality as an endpoint [15,16,18], which may not be the most sensitive endpoint to use. Sublethal, physiological endpoints generally are recognized to be more sensitive than lethal endpoints because physiological endpoints are often the initial reaction of organisms to stress and can be detected before mortality occurs [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whole effluent toxicity tests are increasingly used to monitor compliance of permitted discharges. By using an in situ bioassessment approach, Maltby et al (2000) demonstrated receiving water toxicity and ecological degradation that were consistent with the results of WET tests performed on the point source discharge and concluded that systematic approach provides a comprehensive and ecologically relevant database for assessing the ecological risk posed by point source discharges, so that by applying a set of complementary diagnostic tools, resource managers and dischargers would gain greater confidence in the permit limits set for effluents and the methods used to monitor compliance. Quite a large number of specific research studies of ecotoxicity of industrial effluents using conventional toxicity tests combined with chemical quality assessment, were conducted world-wide, such as, for instance, in Portugal (Mendonca et al 2007), Spain (Rodriguez et al 2006), UK (Tinsley et al 2004), Italy (Guerra 2001), Netherlands (Tonkes et al 1999), Turkey (Sponza 2002), Lithuania and Estonia (Manusadzianas et al 2003), Argentina (Gomez et al 2001;Di Marzio et al 2005), Brasil (Araujo et al 2005) and South Korea (Ra et al 2006a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The feeding rate on leaf discs was expressed in consumed leaf mass (C) and calculated as follows (Maltby et al 2000):…”
Section: Calculations and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%