The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2013.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using simulations and data to evaluate mean sensitivity (ζ) as a useful statistic in dendrochronology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard deviation (r): r is a more reliable and robust descriptive statistic of tree-ring chronologies than mean sensitivity (f) (Bunn et al 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard deviation (r): r is a more reliable and robust descriptive statistic of tree-ring chronologies than mean sensitivity (f) (Bunn et al 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fritts (1976) stated that the reason of yearly changes on tree-ring width is climate and in extreme changes sensitivity ratio increases. Bunn et al (2013) stated that mean sensitivity was conceived as a statistic that would indicate if a series was useful for crossdating or responsive to climate. In this study, we calculate the magnitude of year-by-year sensitivity of tree-ring series to find if there is any change in sensitivity.…”
Section: Chronology Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…represents a better statistic to describe the variations in tree growth, compared to the mean sensitivity which has been reported previously as confusing and ambiguous [50].…”
Section: Low-frequency Signal and High-frequency Variability Of Beechmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HFV was computed from the high-frequency signal of each tree as the conditional standard deviation of the fitted GARCH (1, 1) model. HFV represents a better statistic to describe the variations in tree growth, compared to the mean sensitivity which has been reported previously as confusing and ambiguous [50]. The high-frequency variability ( ) was then estimated using generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) models by using the "fGarch" package [49] implemented in the R software [48].…”
Section: Low-frequency Signal and High-frequency Variability Of Beechmentioning
confidence: 99%