1979
DOI: 10.1080/0020739790100212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using simulation to resolve probability paradoxes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, a student may observe a phenomenon in one of the spreadsheets and wrongly conclude that it holds true in all cases, whereas in fact it may only apply to the special case being considered. As Reinhardt and Loftsgaarden (1979) point out, this is a particular problem with random simulations which, by their very nature, do not always show in a short run the results expected in the long run. Interaction with the package is therefore not only insufficient but potentially dangerous -some interaction with the teacher (whether virtual or real) is essential.…”
Section: Dialogue and Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a student may observe a phenomenon in one of the spreadsheets and wrongly conclude that it holds true in all cases, whereas in fact it may only apply to the special case being considered. As Reinhardt and Loftsgaarden (1979) point out, this is a particular problem with random simulations which, by their very nature, do not always show in a short run the results expected in the long run. Interaction with the package is therefore not only insufficient but potentially dangerous -some interaction with the teacher (whether virtual or real) is essential.…”
Section: Dialogue and Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%