2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30499-9_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Self-organizing Map in a Computerized Decision Support System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the aforesaid training, we used a ''mask'' function to assign a null weight to the breeding parameters, whereas environmental variables were assigned a weight of 1 so that the ordination process was based on the environmental variables only. In addition, setting the mask value to zero for a given component removes the effect of that component on organization (Vesanto et al 2000;Vesanto and Hollmen 2003;Sirola et al 2004;Raivio 2006). The values for breeding parameters were thus visualized on the SOM previously trained with environmental variables only.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Modeling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the aforesaid training, we used a ''mask'' function to assign a null weight to the breeding parameters, whereas environmental variables were assigned a weight of 1 so that the ordination process was based on the environmental variables only. In addition, setting the mask value to zero for a given component removes the effect of that component on organization (Vesanto et al 2000;Vesanto and Hollmen 2003;Sirola et al 2004;Raivio 2006). The values for breeding parameters were thus visualized on the SOM previously trained with environmental variables only.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Modeling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the training, we used a mask function to give a null weight to the five physical variables, whereas biological variables were given a weight of 1 so that the ordination process was based on the 28 invertebrate taxa only (Compin and Ce´re´ghino 2007). Setting mask value to 0 for a given component removes the effect of that component on organization (Sirola et al 2004). …”
Section: Modeling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the training, we used a mask function to give a null weight to the four biological variables (crayfish occurrences), whereas environmental variables were given a weight of 1 so that the ordination process was based on the eight environmental variables only (Compin & Céréghino 2007). Setting mask value to zero for a given component removed the effect of that component on organization (Sirola et al 2004). The occurrence probability of each crayfish species in a given area in the form of the connection intensity was visualized on the SOM map in grey scale, and therefore allowed us: (1) to analyse the effect of each environmental variable on the patterning input dataset (sites), and (2) to predict the occurrence probability of each species in areas (i.e.…”
Section: Modelling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%