2004
DOI: 10.1300/j021v24n02_07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Scripted Video to Assess Interdisciplinary Team Effectiveness Training Outcomes

Abstract: As part of the Geriatric Interdisciplinary Team Training (GITT) Program funded by the John A. Hartford Foundation, the authors of this article worked to create an instrument, the Trainee Test of Team Dynamics, to assess health care trainees' understanding of team dynamics. The Trainee Test of Team Dynamics is a five-question written test designed to capture GITT trainees' knowledge of team process and skills in addressing conflict that is administered after watching a five-minute videotape of a simulated inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 33 instruments that were found, 26 (78.8%) were mentioned and used in only one paper, 3 (9.1%) in two papers and 4 (12.1%) in 3 or more papers. The most frequently used instruments were the Attitudes Towards Healthcare Teams Scale (Hyer et al 2003), the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (Luecht et al 1990) and the UWE Interprofessional Questionnaire (Pollard et al 2004), which were each employed in four papers. Five of the reviewed papers made use of more than one identifiable instrument, with four papers (Pollard et al 2004;Carpenter et al 2006;Kwan et al 2006;Loutzenhiser & Hadjistavropoulos 2008), each using two instruments, and one (MacDonald et al 2008) using three instruments.…”
Section: Phase 1: Literature Review and Initial Instrument Classificamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 33 instruments that were found, 26 (78.8%) were mentioned and used in only one paper, 3 (9.1%) in two papers and 4 (12.1%) in 3 or more papers. The most frequently used instruments were the Attitudes Towards Healthcare Teams Scale (Hyer et al 2003), the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (Luecht et al 1990) and the UWE Interprofessional Questionnaire (Pollard et al 2004), which were each employed in four papers. Five of the reviewed papers made use of more than one identifiable instrument, with four papers (Pollard et al 2004;Carpenter et al 2006;Kwan et al 2006;Loutzenhiser & Hadjistavropoulos 2008), each using two instruments, and one (MacDonald et al 2008) using three instruments.…”
Section: Phase 1: Literature Review and Initial Instrument Classificamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only seven of the 538 items (1.3%) were assigned directly to Level 2b, which represented the acquisition of skills and knowledge relating to IPE and IPP. All were open-ended, qualitative items assessing elements of shared learning (Morison & Jenkins 2007), or effective versus ineffective team behaviours (Trainee Test of Team Dynamics; Hyer et al 2003).…”
Section: Phase 3: Item Categorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants then reported how important they believe exposure to each case in training was on a 1 to 10 scale (10 = very important). Finally, participants reported the value of the team interaction to delivering patient care on scale of 1 to 10 (10 = very important), as an element of the Trainee Test of Team Dynamics (TTTD) [12]. Participants also completed the validated Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) which has 19 5-point Likert scale items and higher scores indicate positive attitudes with respect relating to teamwork and professional identity/ responsibilities [13], the UWE Entry Level Interprofessional Questionnaire (UWEIQ) which is a 27-item, 4- or 5-point Likert scale, instrument where lower scores represent better Communication and Teamwork, Interprofessional Learning, and Interprofessional Interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Video recording has not been used extensively in medical education. Its use varies greatly: Instructional videos are often shown to teach practical skills and demonstrate ideal procedures [ 26 ]. In interprofessional education, videos with intentional mistakes have been used to stimulate discussion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In interprofessional education, videos with intentional mistakes have been used to stimulate discussion. Hyer et al used video recordings of simulated interprofessional team meetings to teach participants how to recognize effective interprofessional interactions [ 20 ], [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%