Using research networks to generate trustworthy qualitative public health research findings from multiple contexts

Abstract

Background: Qualitative research networks (QRNs) bring together researchers from diverse contexts working on multi-country studies. The networks may themselves form a consortium or may contribute to a wider research agenda within a consortium with colleagues from other disciplines. The purpose of a QRN is to ensure robust methods and processes that enable comparisons across contexts. Under the Self-Testing Africa (STAR) initiative and the REACHOUT project on community health systems, QRNs were established, bringing together researchers across countries to coordinate multi-country qualitative research and to ensure robust methods and processes allowing comparisons across contexts. QRNs face both practical challenges in facilitating this iterative exchange process across sites and conceptual challenges interpreting findings between contexts. This paper distils key lessons and reflections from both QRN experiences on how to conduct trustworthy qualitative research across different contexts with examples from Bangladesh,

“I Want to Create So Much Stimulus That Adaptation Goes Through the Roof”: High-Performance Strength Coaches' Perceptions of Planned Overreaching

“…In qualitative research, reflexivity is an integral aspect of transparency during qualitative research practice (Korstjens and Moser, 2018 ) and acknowledges how the relationship between researcher and participant might influence the construction of knowledge during the research process (Nyirenda et al, 2020 ). To enhance trustworthiness and reflexivity, the background of the principal investigator was made transparent to participants prior to each interview.…”

Managing periprosthetic joint infection—a qualitative analysis of nursing staffs’ experiences

“…Here, no further corrections were made. To ensure trustworthiness of this research [ 16 ], credibility (internal validy) was enhanced by iterative questioning and rapport building. All participants were aware, that given statements will not be assigned to them personally and will have no effect regarding their professional position.…”

Multidisciplinary team members’ perceptions regarding advanced psychiatric nurses’ attitudes on mental healthcare

“…To ensure authenticity of the study findings, the four strategies of trustworthiness namely, credibility, dependability, confirmability and transferability were employed (Nyirende et al 2020 :2). Credibility ensured that the findings obtained were congruent through prolonged engagement and member checking.…”