2015
DOI: 10.3390/rs70606510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using RapidEye and MODIS Data Fusion to Monitor Vegetation Dynamics in Semi-Arid Rangelands in South Africa

Abstract: Image time series of high temporal and spatial resolution capture land surface dynamics of heterogeneous landscapes. We applied the ESTARFM (Enhanced Spatial and Temporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model) algorithm to multi-spectral images covering two semi-arid heterogeneous rangeland study sites located in South Africa. MODIS 250 m resolution and RapidEye 5 m resolution images were fused to produce synthetic RapidEye images, from June 2011 to July 2012. We evaluated the performance of the algorithm by compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the predictions were generally best for the SWIR band and worst for the RED band, except for the predictions for 7 May at Site 1 and 25 May at Site 2. This result is consistent with numerous studies that the ESTARFM have shown better performance at the longer wavelength [49]. For the predicted images on 7 and 25 May, the accuracy was lower for the NIR than for the RED band, which was probably a result of the changes in land-cover from seasonal farming activities in the cropped areas at the end of the growing season, and the NIR band was more sensitive to these changes than the RED and SWIR bands.…”
Section: The Estarfm Prediction Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Notably, the predictions were generally best for the SWIR band and worst for the RED band, except for the predictions for 7 May at Site 1 and 25 May at Site 2. This result is consistent with numerous studies that the ESTARFM have shown better performance at the longer wavelength [49]. For the predicted images on 7 and 25 May, the accuracy was lower for the NIR than for the RED band, which was probably a result of the changes in land-cover from seasonal farming activities in the cropped areas at the end of the growing season, and the NIR band was more sensitive to these changes than the RED and SWIR bands.…”
Section: The Estarfm Prediction Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Gaps in the image archive can pose a problem for the procedure, particularly when the 16-day gap between Landsat observations coincides with a period of dense cloud cover. Regularly spaced observations would allow for a phenology-based approach that also has the potential for crop-type differentiation [43], but might require an image-fusion step to be applicable at field-scale-for example Landsat with MODIS data [72]; [73] or Rapideye and MODIS [74]. The authors of [75] demonstrated the use of multispectral Landsat information combined with temporal MODIS information for crop mapping.…”
Section: Future Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this classic discrepancy in remote sensing, fusing data from different sensors has gained increasing popularity in recent years for combining high temporal resolution sensors with medium to high spatial resolution sensors. Especially the Spatial and Temporal Adaptive Reflectance Fusion Model (STARFM) [2] and its enhanced version ESTARFM [3] have been frequently applied as described in the literature (e.g., [4][5][6][7][8]). Recent comparison studies highlighted the respective advantages of the two algorithms compared to other simple fusion approaches, but the overall accuracies are found to be highest for ESTARFM [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their conclusion, the value of such data fusion for land management and forest conversion was highlighted [12]. Tewes et al [5] fused 250 m MODIS and 5 m RapidEye data using ESTARFM to monitor vegetation dynamics in semi-arid rangelands of South Africa (study area: 1434 km 2 ). Their results indicate the suitability of ESTARFM to characterize phenological development of different vegetation types in such heterogeneous areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%