Abstract:This paper describes the construction of a financial stress index (FSI). Our index incorporates the level, volatility and comovement of a variety of financial series, rather than a single dimension of the data. To determine which time periods are ones of notable financial stress and thus the relevant ones for determining the role of the level, volatility and comovement of our financial series, we use actions taken by policymakers. In addition to describing the construction of our FSI, we discuss issues relevan… Show more
“…Butters (2011, 2012) Financial instability. Carlson, Lewis, and Nelson (2012) Markets that are not "functioning or behaving in a typical fashion" (p. 3); "impaired functioning might take the form of increased difficulty in executing transactions or an inability of intermediaries to fund their market-making operations at usual tenors. Fragility might take the form of exceptionally heightened sensitivity to new information or shocks" (p. 12).…”
Section: Financial Stress Indexes Versus Financial Conditions Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An FCI can also be used to predict changes in economic business cycles. As such, an FSI can be considered a snapshot of the level of fragility in the financial market and an FCI a mapping of financial conditions onto macroeconomic conditions (Carlson, Lewis, and Nelson, 2012;CLNFCI). In this sense, FSIs have "no natural observable counterpart in the real world" (Louzis and Vouldis, 2011, p. 3) and can only be measured relative to themselves, while FCIs assume a relationship between the financial sector and an element of the macroeconomy.…”
Section: Financial Stress Indexes Versus Financial Conditions Indexesmentioning
The recent financial crisis helped emphasize the need for measures of financial conditions. In the wake of the crisis, several researchers and institutions-both private sector and central bank-developed measures of financial stress. These measures are intended to capture, among other things, the liquidity in financial markets and potentially forecast changes in real economic conditions. Unfortunately, there is no agreement about which variables should be included in a measure of stress. The authors survey a number of financial stress indexes, comparing the datasets from which they are constructed. In principle, each of the indexes measures the same thing; thus, they should be highly correlated. The authors find that in practice, however, the correlations are high but not as high as might be expected. They also evaluate the ability of the indexes to predict future economic activity in a simple vector autoregressive forecasting model. (JEL E44, E66) Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, September/October 2012, 94(5), pp. 369-97.
“…Butters (2011, 2012) Financial instability. Carlson, Lewis, and Nelson (2012) Markets that are not "functioning or behaving in a typical fashion" (p. 3); "impaired functioning might take the form of increased difficulty in executing transactions or an inability of intermediaries to fund their market-making operations at usual tenors. Fragility might take the form of exceptionally heightened sensitivity to new information or shocks" (p. 12).…”
Section: Financial Stress Indexes Versus Financial Conditions Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An FCI can also be used to predict changes in economic business cycles. As such, an FSI can be considered a snapshot of the level of fragility in the financial market and an FCI a mapping of financial conditions onto macroeconomic conditions (Carlson, Lewis, and Nelson, 2012;CLNFCI). In this sense, FSIs have "no natural observable counterpart in the real world" (Louzis and Vouldis, 2011, p. 3) and can only be measured relative to themselves, while FCIs assume a relationship between the financial sector and an element of the macroeconomy.…”
Section: Financial Stress Indexes Versus Financial Conditions Indexesmentioning
The recent financial crisis helped emphasize the need for measures of financial conditions. In the wake of the crisis, several researchers and institutions-both private sector and central bank-developed measures of financial stress. These measures are intended to capture, among other things, the liquidity in financial markets and potentially forecast changes in real economic conditions. Unfortunately, there is no agreement about which variables should be included in a measure of stress. The authors survey a number of financial stress indexes, comparing the datasets from which they are constructed. In principle, each of the indexes measures the same thing; thus, they should be highly correlated. The authors find that in practice, however, the correlations are high but not as high as might be expected. They also evaluate the ability of the indexes to predict future economic activity in a simple vector autoregressive forecasting model. (JEL E44, E66) Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, September/October 2012, 94(5), pp. 369-97.
“…This example illustrates how financial crises and external borrowing have generally been related.The period around 2000: The model with asset prices and the current account also signals elevated risks in the United States beginning in 1998 and in many other countries around the same time. While a crisis was not identified in this database for that period, it coincides with the Long-term Capital Management incident -which led to policy action and is hence identified as a distress event inCarlson et al (2014). In addition, the collapse of the dot-com bubble and subsequent recession came soon after the model signaled possible problems.…”
Research has suggested that a rapid pace of nonfinancial borrowing reliably precedes financial crises, placing the pace of debt growth at the center of frameworks for the deployment of macroprudential policies. I reconsider the role of asset-prices and current account deficits as leading indicators of financial crises. Run-ups in equity and house prices and a widening of the current account deficit have substantially larger (and more statistically-significant) effects than debt growth on the probability of a financial crisis in standard crisis-prediction models. The analysis highlights the value of graphs of predicted crisis probabilities in an assessment of predictors.
“…Among the recent research contributions to financial stress are studies by Hakkio and Keeton (2009), Hatzius et al (2010), Kliesen and Smith (2010), Oet et al (2011a), Brave andButters (2011), Holló, Kremer, andLo Duca (2012), and Carlson, Lewis, and Nelson (2012). Principally, an FSI design conception follows the users' functional objectives.…”
This paper develops a new fi nancial stress measure (Cleveland Financial Stress Index, CFSI) that considers the supervisory objective of identifying risks to the stability of the fi nancial system. The index provides a continuous signal of fi nancial stress and broad coverage of the areas that could indicate it. The construction methodology uses daily public market data collected from different sectors of fi nancial markets. A unique feature of the index is that it employs a dynamic weighting method that captures the changing relative importance of the different sectors of the fi nancial system. This study shows how the index can be applied to monitoring and analyzing fi nancial system conditions. Keywords: fi nancial system stability, systemic risk, fi nancial stress, fi nancial supervision, fi nancial stress index.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.