2017
DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2017.051111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Plickers Cooperate with Peer Instruction to Promote Students' Discussion in Introductory Physics Course

Abstract: In decades Peer Instruction (PI) has been confirmed that it can improve students' conceptual understanding. Anyway the main problem for using PI is an audience responding system which required for gathering students' answer, to enhance learning process of PI instead of using Clickers which cost about 40 USD per item. In this work we decided to use Plickers: the free application in smartphones. The purpose of this research is to develop the students' conceptual understanding in work and energy by using PI strat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding implications for practice, preliminary findings on the use of Plickers suggest that it increases students' performance when utilized with PI (WUTTIPROM et al, 2017). Student involvement and learning were also found to be enhanced (WOOD et al, 2017).…”
Section: Final Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding implications for practice, preliminary findings on the use of Plickers suggest that it increases students' performance when utilized with PI (WUTTIPROM et al, 2017). Student involvement and learning were also found to be enhanced (WOOD et al, 2017).…”
Section: Final Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These findings support that Plickers is an attractive alternative pedagogy comparatively to different types of SRS. Wuttiprom et al (2017) analyzed the Plickers usage in conjunction with peer instruction (PI) at the Ratchathani University, Thailand. The first-year undergraduate students of Chemistry (n = 50) and Engineering (n = 119) constituted the sample of the study.…”
Section: Rmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…‫طالب‬ ‫الدافعية،‬ ‫التح�سيل،‬ ،Plickers ‫البنائي،‬ ‫التقومي‬ ‫إنرتنت،‬ ‫اال‬ ‫عرب‬ ‫التقييم‬ ‫املفتاحية:‬ ‫الكلمات‬ ‫االبتدائي.‬ ‫الثالث‬ ‫ال�سف‬(Wuttiprom, Toeddhanya, Buachoom, & Wuttisela, 2017) ‫املعلم‬ ‫قبل‬…”
unclassified