2017
DOI: 10.5194/amt-10-3103-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using paraxial approximation to describe the optical setup of a typical EARLINET lidar system

Abstract: Abstract. The mathematical formulation for the optical setup of a typical EARLINET lidar system is given here. The equations describing a lidar system from the emitted laser beam to the projection of the telescope aperture on the final receiving unit (i.e., photomultiplier or photodiode) are presented, based on paraxial approximation and geometric optics approach. The receiving optical setup includes a telescope, a collimating lens, an interference filter and the ensemble objective eyepiece. The set of the der… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance of full overlap is not below about 100 m. In this case of a well aligned lidar system with well designed eyepieces, the raw signal differences between the telecover sectors indicate just the different sensitivities of the different areas of the photomultipliers, which are different in the three channels. The measured telecover differences can be compared to paraxial (see also Kokkalis (2017)) and exact ray tracing (ZEMAX) simulations of the system including apertures and optical coatings to narrow down possible causes. Figure 26 shows the paraxial near range simulation of the field of view for the full telescope aperture (left), and for the N (blue) and S (magenta) telecover sector with a circular field stop in the focal plane of the telescope (neglecting the obscuration of the secondary mirror).…”
Section: Dark Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance of full overlap is not below about 100 m. In this case of a well aligned lidar system with well designed eyepieces, the raw signal differences between the telecover sectors indicate just the different sensitivities of the different areas of the photomultipliers, which are different in the three channels. The measured telecover differences can be compared to paraxial (see also Kokkalis (2017)) and exact ray tracing (ZEMAX) simulations of the system including apertures and optical coatings to narrow down possible causes. Figure 26 shows the paraxial near range simulation of the field of view for the full telescope aperture (left), and for the N (blue) and S (magenta) telecover sector with a circular field stop in the focal plane of the telescope (neglecting the obscuration of the secondary mirror).…”
Section: Dark Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometrical specification of EOLE makes feasible the full overlap of the laser beam with the receiver field of view to be reached at heights of the order of 800 m a.g.l. (Kokkalis, et al, 2012;Kokkalis, 2017). An additional depolarization channel at 355 nm was added in 2016 in order to obtain the linear particle and volume depolarization ratio vertical profiles in the atmosphere.…”
Section: Athens Raman Lidar Depolarization System (Eole)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The six-wavelength Raman-backscatter lidar system (EOLE) operates in Athens since February 2000 as part of the EARLINET network (Pappalardo et al, 2014). The system is designed following the optical set-up of a typical member station (Kokkalis 2017), meeting all the quality assurance requirements of the network. The emission unit is based on a pulsed Nd:YAG laser, emitting high energy pulses at 355, 532 and 1064 nm with a repetition rate of 10 Hz.…”
Section: Eole Lidar Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, only daytime measurements are used and therefore no overlap correction is applied on the signals. The geometrical configuration of EOLE results in full overlap distance of 500-800 m above ground (Kokkalis 2017). The aerosol extinction values below the 1000 m a.s.l.…”
Section: Eole Lidar Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%