2018
DOI: 10.5194/amt-2017-395
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EARLINET lidar quality assurance tools

Abstract: Abstract. This paper describes the EARLINET quality assurance (QA) check-up tools for the hardware of lidars, developed in the recent years to monitor and improve the quality of the lidar systems and of their products. These check-up tools are the trigger-delay test, the Rayleigh-fit, the lidar test-pulse generator, the dark measurement, the telecover test, and the polarisation calibration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, as far as the daytime measurements are concerned, we preferred to use only measurements performed between 10:00 and 13:00 UTC. After sunset, the boundary layer collapses fast, and the stable boundary layer (SBL) forms typically less than 0.5 km above the ground (Garratt, 1992;Mehta et al, 2017). The mixing mechanisms are restricted within this layer during the night.…”
Section: Boundary Layer Height Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, as far as the daytime measurements are concerned, we preferred to use only measurements performed between 10:00 and 13:00 UTC. After sunset, the boundary layer collapses fast, and the stable boundary layer (SBL) forms typically less than 0.5 km above the ground (Garratt, 1992;Mehta et al, 2017). The mixing mechanisms are restricted within this layer during the night.…”
Section: Boundary Layer Height Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These campaigns aimed to establish the standard methods that can be utilized by all the stations. Additionally, some quality standards have been established, in order to make the lidar products of the different systems comparable and to be able to provide quality-assured datasets of network products (Freudenthaler et al, 2018).…”
Section: Dataset Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…optical misalignment, detector saturation, experimental setup, electronic problems) leading to systematic errors in the aerosol products, and to figure out technical solutions to fix instrumental problems. As a first step, a set of tests are performed for each optical channel to check the optical alignment (Rayleigh-fit and telecover tests), the trigger delay, the dark current (to evidence electronic distortions), the detector saturation and several instrumental parameters [4]. As a second step, the range corrected signals (RCS) are compared in terms of relative differences in the PBL, in the layers and on the whole measurement range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 10 those signals are plotted and compared with the molecular RCS as in the 'Rayleigh-fit' quality assurance test that is standardized in EARLINET [37]. A moving average of 150 m and 375 m has been applied for elastic and RR signals, respectively.…”
Section: Daytime Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%