2016
DOI: 10.1002/mma.4237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using operational matrix for solving nonlinear class of mixed Volterra–Fredholm integral equations

Abstract: This paper presents a computational technique for the solution of the nonlinear mixed Volterra–Fredholm integral equations of the second kind. Using the properties of three‐dimensional modification of hat functions, these are types of equations to a nonlinear system of algebraic equations. Also, convergence results and error analysis are discussed. The efficiency and accuracy of the proposed method is illustrated by numerical examples. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, we obtain the error in mid‐points of each interval [ ih , ( i + 1) h ) with e()xi=u()xiu*()xi,1emi=0,1,,m1, for xi=()2i+1h2,1emi=0,1,,m1, where u ( x ) and u * ( x ) are exact and approximate solutions of Volterra‐Fredholm integral equation, respectively.Example Consider the following linear Volterra‐Fredholm integral equation 13 u()x=23x13x4+0xitalicxtu()titalicdt+01italicxtu()titalicdt, where the exact solution is u ( x ) = x . We compare our method with the numerical results of Scaling Functions Interpolation (SFI) method 9 for this example. Example Consider the following linear Volterra‐Fredholm integral equation 5 u()x=25x754x4+x35920x+1+0x()2x2t+1u()titalicdt+01x()t+1u()titalicdt, in which the exact solution is u ( x ) = x 3 + 1. For this example, we use the Repeated Trapezoidal (RT) method 5 for comparing numerical results.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, we obtain the error in mid‐points of each interval [ ih , ( i + 1) h ) with e()xi=u()xiu*()xi,1emi=0,1,,m1, for xi=()2i+1h2,1emi=0,1,,m1, where u ( x ) and u * ( x ) are exact and approximate solutions of Volterra‐Fredholm integral equation, respectively.Example Consider the following linear Volterra‐Fredholm integral equation 13 u()x=23x13x4+0xitalicxtu()titalicdt+01italicxtu()titalicdt, where the exact solution is u ( x ) = x . We compare our method with the numerical results of Scaling Functions Interpolation (SFI) method 9 for this example. Example Consider the following linear Volterra‐Fredholm integral equation 5 u()x=25x754x4+x35920x+1+0x()2x2t+1u()titalicdt+01x()t+1u()titalicdt, in which the exact solution is u ( x ) = x 3 + 1. For this example, we use the Repeated Trapezoidal (RT) method 5 for comparing numerical results.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different techniques have been introduced to solve (1), such as truncated Chebyshev series, 4 moving least square method and Chebyshev polynomials 5 and inverse and direct discrete fuzzy transforms and collocation technique 6 . Some of other methods are discussed in References 7‐11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mirzaee and Samadyar [13] used Bernstein collocation method for solution of 2D-mixed Volterra-Fredholm IEs. Mirzaee and Hadadiyan utilized operational matrix [14] for solution of nonlinear class of mixed Volterra-Fredholm IEs, Bell polynomials [15] for solution of nonlinear Fredholm-Volterra IEs and modification of hat functions [16] for solution of Volterra-Fredholm IEs. Mirzaee and Hadadiyan [17] also found the solution of two-dimensional Volterra-Fredholm IEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the development of effective and easy‐to‐use numerical schemes for solving such equations acquires an increasing interest. While several numerical techniques have been proposed to solve many different problems (see, for instance [22–49], and references therein), there have been few research studies that developed numerical methods to solve DOFDEs (see [50–58]). The development, however, for efficient numerical methods to solve DOFDEs is still an important issue [51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%