2012
DOI: 10.3354/esr00424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using non-conspicuous metrics to examine selected impacts of disturbance on a long-lived reptile

Abstract: Loss or disturbance of habitat often results in landscapes being fragmented into a series of isolated remnants varying in size, quality, and conservation value. Habitat disturbance has deleterious consequences for ecosystem processes, but can have varying effects on species persistence. Many deleterious effects on species post-disturbance are obvious, yet some are more subtle and can elude detection in long-lived species. We used more subtle metrics to evaluate populations of endangered iguanas Iguana delicati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study provides the first robust estimate of the abundance, adult survival, and recruitment rates of a Lesser Antillean iguana population. Although the density of this species on Chancel Islet (873.03 iguanas/km 2 in 2020) is much higher than in other places (e.g., 35 iguanas/km 2 in St Eustatius) (Debrot et al., 2013 ), it is still far below the highest estimated densities for this species, which can exceed 4,000 iguanas/km 2 under favorable conditions (Knapp & Perez‐Heydrich, 2012 ). Despite the protected status of the islet and the lack of obvious threats to adult survival, the population declined rapidly at a rate of 4% per year, which would lead it to become quasi‐extinct within the next 50 years if drastic action is not taken to reverse the trend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our study provides the first robust estimate of the abundance, adult survival, and recruitment rates of a Lesser Antillean iguana population. Although the density of this species on Chancel Islet (873.03 iguanas/km 2 in 2020) is much higher than in other places (e.g., 35 iguanas/km 2 in St Eustatius) (Debrot et al., 2013 ), it is still far below the highest estimated densities for this species, which can exceed 4,000 iguanas/km 2 under favorable conditions (Knapp & Perez‐Heydrich, 2012 ). Despite the protected status of the islet and the lack of obvious threats to adult survival, the population declined rapidly at a rate of 4% per year, which would lead it to become quasi‐extinct within the next 50 years if drastic action is not taken to reverse the trend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We captured free-ranging adult iguanas by noose in the summers of 2007, 2008, and 2009. Earlier summer months coincided with the timing of female migration to communal nesting sites, whereas August and September aligned with the primary hatching period (Knapp & Perez-Heydrich, 2012). Blood was collected by venipuncture of the ventral coccygeal vein using a heparinized syringe and stored in vacutainer tubes with 100 mM Tris, 100 mM Na 2 EDTA, 10 mM NaCl, and 1% SDS at a ratio of 1:2 (Longmire, Maltbie, & Baker, 1997).…”
Section: Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, besides gardens, also the periferic habitats of this residential area are important iguana habitats. Indeed, Knapp and Perez-Heydrich (2012) found that biometric variables did not differ between iguanas living in- and outside of gardens. Furthermore, highest iguana abundance was found in the Chionanthus - Nectandra mountain habitat (De Freitas et al 2012), at high (386m) elevation on the volcano, however this habitat was covered by a single transect, thus we lack a perspective of variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%