“…According to a meta‐analysis conducted by Miller and Coltman (), our low g 2 as well as low HHC values should indicate weak HFCs, which could be difficult to detect. Our number of microsatellite loci used (15) is low, but close to the average of other HFC studies (Chapman et al, ; Miller & Coltman, ), and our number of genotyped individuals ( N = 7,974) far exceeds the published range (7–1,055), such that our number of genotypes (7,974 individuals × 15 markers = 119,610 genotypes; Slate et al, ) is more than double the highest number of genotypes (573 individuals × 101 markers = 57,873 genotypes; Slate et al, ) of all studies reviewed in Chapman et al (; also see Harrison et al, ; Judson, Knapp, & Welch, ; Monceau et al, ; Shaner et al, ; Soulsbury & Lebigre, ; Velando et al, ; Voegeli, Saladin, Wegmann, & Richner, for examples of more recent studies using a similar or even lower number of loci for estimating HFCs). The low number of loci used, associated with the weak HFCs detected, could prevent the detection of local effects (Szulkin et al, ), but, as also stated by Szulkin et al (), although a larger number of loci provide a more precise inbreeding estimate, a lower number of markers should not be used as an argument to invalidate significant findings.…”