2018
DOI: 10.3390/fi10090084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Noise Level to Detect Frame Repetition Forgery in Video Frame Rate Up-Conversion

Abstract: Frame repetition (FR) is a common temporal-domain tampering operator, which is often used to increase the frame rate of video sequences. Existing methods detect FR forgery by analyzing residual variation or similarity between video frames; however, these methods are easily interfered with by noise, affecting the stability of detection performance. This paper proposes a noise-level based detection method which detects the varying noise level over time to determine whether the video is forged by FR. Wavelet coef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The process is similar to deconvolution, which can reverse the convolution process and extract the real earthquake pulse signals from the mixed seismic records and artificial pulse signals [33][34][35][36]. To understand the randomness in the signal, we use the median absolute deviation (MAD) value to determine the minimum threshold of the wavelet coefficients in the time series [37,38]. Then, we filter out the low coefficients from the wavelet coefficients and reconstruct the real earthquake signals from the remaining coefficients.…”
Section: Removing Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process is similar to deconvolution, which can reverse the convolution process and extract the real earthquake pulse signals from the mixed seismic records and artificial pulse signals [33][34][35][36]. To understand the randomness in the signal, we use the median absolute deviation (MAD) value to determine the minimum threshold of the wavelet coefficients in the time series [37,38]. Then, we filter out the low coefficients from the wavelet coefficients and reconstruct the real earthquake signals from the remaining coefficients.…”
Section: Removing Noisementioning
confidence: 99%