1996
DOI: 10.1016/0925-2312(95)00019-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using neural networks to forecast the S&P 100 implied volatility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Malliaris and Salchenberger [19], NNs present the relationship between inputs and outputs using the architecture of human brain to process large information and detect patterns by interconnecting and organizing them in different layers for information processing purposes. These layers are formed by a set of processing elements or neurons.…”
Section: Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Malliaris and Salchenberger [19], NNs present the relationship between inputs and outputs using the architecture of human brain to process large information and detect patterns by interconnecting and organizing them in different layers for information processing purposes. These layers are formed by a set of processing elements or neurons.…”
Section: Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malliaris et al presented that the back propagation outperforms even Black. Shore, a popular statistical model in business management science, in predicting S & P implied volatility [13]. Levin proposed back propagation as the best approach to selection of beneficial stock [12].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is effective for input and output relationship modeling even for noisy data, and has been demonstrated to effectively model nonlinear relationships. Studies on derivative securities pricing using neural network have attracted researchers and practitioners, and they applied the neural network model and obtained better results than using the traditional stochastic model (Hutchinson et al 1994;Malliaris and Salchenberger 1996;Qi 1999;Yao et al 2000;Amilon 2003;Binner et al 2005;Lin and Yeh 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%