Using natural capital and ecosystem services to facilitate participatory environmental decision making: Results from a systematic map

Abstract

The rights all people have for involvement in environmental decision making has long been established yet collaborative resource management has had mixed success. Natural capital; the renewable and non‐renewable natural assets that benefit societies, and the flow of ecosystem services these assets provide, are increasingly promoted as approaches that ensure consideration of the environment in decision making. Natural capital and ecosystem services concepts can facilitate participation in decision making by explicitly describing the role of the environment in sustaining society. Increased promotion of these approaches requires consideration on how best to involve stakeholders, those involved and affected by a decision, in the process. We conducted a systematic search to identify where stakeholders have participated in natural capital, ecosystem services and nature’s contributions to people decision making, creating a systematic map of 56 case studies. While many papers discussing stakeholders and these concepts were found, few actively engaged stakeholders in a decision‐making process that used the concepts and therefore were included in the map. Where stakeholders were involved, engagement methods included focus group discussion, stakeholder negotiation and scenario development, as well as ecosystem service ranking and mapping. Ranking for prioritisation of ecosystem services was common, with a bias towards using services with a direct tangible economic benefit; food production and tourism, are both prominent examples. A limited number of case studies performed robust participatory methods evaluations, offering little indication of how best to use natural capital or ecosystem services in participatory approaches. Therefore, the work highlights need for greater evaluation of participatory processes involving natural capital to ensure stakeholder engagement is efficient, productive and useful to all involved. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

The Natural Capital approach: A framework for the successful recovery of nature in estuaries

“…The UK National Parks Partnership working alongside a financial organization (Palladium) provides another. Despite this difficulty, previous studies have noted that this is necessary for long‐term effective conservation in dynamic and complex systems such as estuaries (Cosgrove, 2020; Jacobs et al., 2013; Rounsevell et al., 2018) and the Natural Capital approach does provide a framework to facilitate participation from stakeholders and local landowners (Hinson et al., 2022; Kenter, 2019).…”

People and nature: The emerging signature of a relational journal

“…In pulling these human and non‐human worlds together, the Journal has also partly emerged as a venue for advancing a social‐ecological systems view of people–nature relations, with harmonising approaches to natural resource management—such as ecosystem services, nature's benefits to people, nature‐based solutions—acting as prominent conceptual and analytical starting points for study (e.g. Berdejo‐Espinola et al, 2021; Hinson et al, 2022; Thogmartin et al, 2022). These system frameworks carry with them the ambition of creating highly integrative scenarios‐based analyses of people–nature relationships, often with a strong economic and institutional dimension.…”

Urban nature visitation, accessibility, and impact of travel distance for sustainable cities

“…In addition to SDG 11, these efforts can help planners and managers pursue a range of other interdependent sustainability goals for a green transition, including SDG 4 (quality education), SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy), SDG 9 (industry, innovation, and infrastructure), and SDG 12 (responsible production and consumption) 1 . Altogether, nature in cities will need to be managed according to local climates and geographies, have adequate staffing and funding, and include community engagement to inform planning and strengthen human-nature connections 2 , 50 , 51 . In this manner, cities will be able to make progress toward SDGs by enhancing urban sustainability and providing inclusive and accessible urban nature.…”