2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68981-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using multiple short epochs optimises the stability of infant EEG connectivity parameters

Abstract: Atypicalities in connectivity between brain regions have been implicated in a range of neurocognitive disorders. We require metrics to assess stable individual differences in connectivity in the developing brain, while facing the challenge of limited data quality and quantity. Here, we examine how varying core processing parameters can optimise the test-retest reliability of eeG connectivity measures in infants. EEG was recorded twice with a 1-week interval between sessions in 10-month-olds. EEG alpha connecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(194 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precision can be calculated through metrics like split‐half or test–retest reliability and can be used to refine measurement parameters (e.g. Haartsen, van der Velde, Jones, Johnson, & Kemner, 2020 ); these should be examined across the full range of measurements. Further, precision can be significantly improved by the use of repeat testing.…”
Section: From Framework To Testable Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precision can be calculated through metrics like split‐half or test–retest reliability and can be used to refine measurement parameters (e.g. Haartsen, van der Velde, Jones, Johnson, & Kemner, 2020 ); these should be examined across the full range of measurements. Further, precision can be significantly improved by the use of repeat testing.…”
Section: From Framework To Testable Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the application of aEEG in preterm infants is not universal. Recent studies have shown that abnormalities of aEEG are related to brain damage and poor neurological prognosis in preterm infants [8]. Early postnatal monitoring of aEEG provides a valuable time window for neuroprotective intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed test-retest reliability of the ERP features using ICC between measures at visit 1 and visit 2 as in Haartsen et al (2020) and van der Velde et al ( 2019). We used the ICC(3,1) that is a two-way fixed model ICC suitable to measure the consistency between single scores (Salarian, 2016;Shrout & Fleiss, 1979;Weir, 2005).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values for the ICC typically range between 0 and 1, with values close to 0 indicating poor test-retest reliability, and those close to 1 indicating excellent reliability. We interpreted the ICC values in accordance with the following convention: ICC values below .40 as poor; ICC values from .40 to .59 as fair, ICC values from .60 to .75 as good, and ICCs above .75 as excellent(Haartsen et al, 2020;Hardmeier et al, 2014;van der Velde et al, 2019). ICC values were calculated for ERP features of waveforms for the checkerboards, faces (collapsed across F I G U R E 3 Flowchart of the subsamples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%