2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-57615-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using matching estimators to evaluate alternative youth employment programs: Evidence from France, 1986–1988

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
58
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…To include workers working overtime hours, Rubin's model can be extended using the framework with multiple treatments as it was recently developed in Imbens (1999), Lechner (1999), and Brodaty, Crépon, and Fougère (1999). In 1981, before the change in the standard workweek, the overtime premium was 25% for all hours between 41 and 44 and 50% for all hours strictly above 44.…”
Section: Motivation and Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To include workers working overtime hours, Rubin's model can be extended using the framework with multiple treatments as it was recently developed in Imbens (1999), Lechner (1999), and Brodaty, Crépon, and Fougère (1999). In 1981, before the change in the standard workweek, the overtime premium was 25% for all hours between 41 and 44 and 50% for all hours strictly above 44.…”
Section: Motivation and Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the programs consist in providing training, job seeking support, vocational course, and adaptation training (for the youngest). Microeconometric studies carried out by Bonnal et al (1997), Fougère et al (2000), and Brodaty et al(2001) have investigated the impact of such policies on employment prospects of young people and unskilled workers. However, few contributions have addressed the issue of employment programs for laid off or displaced workers 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Microeconometric studies looking at the relative effects of Swedish programmes include among others Carling and Gustafson (1999) for self-employment subsidies versus subsidised jobs, Melkersson (1999a, b) and Frölich, Heshmati and Lechner (2000) for programmes targeted at the disabled, Larsson (2000) for youth programmes, Johansson and Martinson (2000) for two types of labour market training programmes and Carling and Richardson (2001) for the relative efficiency of eight of the Swedish programmes. Evaluations of differential programme impacts outside the Swedish context include the recent work by Gerfin and Lechner (2000) for Switzerland and by Brodaty, Crépon and Fougère (2000) as well as Bonnal, Fougère and Sérandon (1997) for France, and the earlier work by Ridder (1986) for the Netherlands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%