2011
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using market-based dispatching with environmental price signals to reduce emissions and water use at power plants in the Texas grid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Texas electrical grid, operated by the Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), coal-based generation decreased from 37% of generation in 2008to 24% in 2014(ERCOT, 2009. In ERCOT, natural gas-fired units generally have lower air pollutant emissions per kilowatt hour of generation, relative to the coal plants, so when lower natural gas prices drive shifts from coal-based generation to natural gas-based generation, emissions of NO x , particulate matter (PM), sulfur oxides (SO x ), and carbon dioxide decrease (Alhajeri et al, 2011). Pacsi et al (2013 have modeled the electricity generation shifts, from coal to natural gas, that would be expected in ERCOT as natural gas prices change from $7.74 per million BTU (a representative price from 2006 to 2008), to $3.87 per million BTU, $2.88 per million BTU (an average price in late 2012) and $1.89 per million BTU (the price in late 2015, and a price equivalent to coal on an energy basis).…”
Section: Life Cycle Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Texas electrical grid, operated by the Electricity Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), coal-based generation decreased from 37% of generation in 2008to 24% in 2014(ERCOT, 2009. In ERCOT, natural gas-fired units generally have lower air pollutant emissions per kilowatt hour of generation, relative to the coal plants, so when lower natural gas prices drive shifts from coal-based generation to natural gas-based generation, emissions of NO x , particulate matter (PM), sulfur oxides (SO x ), and carbon dioxide decrease (Alhajeri et al, 2011). Pacsi et al (2013 have modeled the electricity generation shifts, from coal to natural gas, that would be expected in ERCOT as natural gas prices change from $7.74 per million BTU (a representative price from 2006 to 2008), to $3.87 per million BTU, $2.88 per million BTU (an average price in late 2012) and $1.89 per million BTU (the price in late 2015, and a price equivalent to coal on an energy basis).…”
Section: Life Cycle Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water consumption is defined as the amount of water that is evaporated or permanently removed from the immediate water environment, while water withdrawal refers to the amount of water removed from the surface water or groundwater source for use. Thus, water consumption is the total amount of withdrawal minus returned amount of water (AlHajeri et al 2011). Water consumption is calculated in terms of the amount of water consumed to produce electricity -megawatt-hour (MWh).…”
Section: Electricity and Water Consumption And/or Withdrawalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summary of scenario assumptions for the price of natural gas in the power sector and well completion activity in shale gas production regions in released in the United States (Alhajeri et al 2011a); electricity generation is also the largest category of water use in the United States, measured as withdrawals (Kenny et al 2009). As a result, changes to the electricity generation system have the ability to influence many regional environmental parameters, including air quality, water availability, and greenhouse gas emissions.…”
Section: Texasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fine PM refers broadly to liquid and solid species (aerosols) in the air with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 microns, which are small enough to pass through barriers in the lungs (Dockery et al 1994); Power plants both directly emit fine PM and emit SO 2 and other species that can subsequently react to form PM. In Texas, sulfate (SO 4 ), which results from the oxidation of SO 2 , is the largest single mass component of fine PM (Russell et al 2004 (Alhajeri et al 2011a). Trade-offs between the prices of NO x and CO 2 have also been investigated (Alhajeri 2012).…”
Section: List Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation