2010
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using manifold embedding for assessing and predicting protein interactions from high-throughput experimental data

Abstract: Motivation: High-throughput protein interaction data, with everincreasing volume, are becoming the foundation of many biological discoveries, and thus high-quality protein-protein interaction (PPI) maps are critical for a deeper understanding of cellular processes. However, the unreliability and paucity of current available PPI data are key obstacles to the subsequent quantitative studies. It is therefore highly desirable to develop an approach to deal with these issues from the computational perspective. Most… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
129
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such experiments are time consuming and expensive. Because of this, researchers have developed computational approaches for predicting novel interactions (You et al , 2010), intended also to guide wet lab experiments. The topological prediction of new interactions is a novel and useful option based exclusively on the structural information provided by the PPI network (PPIN) topology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, such experiments are time consuming and expensive. Because of this, researchers have developed computational approaches for predicting novel interactions (You et al , 2010), intended also to guide wet lab experiments. The topological prediction of new interactions is a novel and useful option based exclusively on the structural information provided by the PPI network (PPIN) topology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of candidate interactions is then ranked. The main problem with these techniques is that their performance is poor when applied to sparse and noisy networks (You et al , 2010). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, an index like CD u,v is applied to this graph to estimate the likelihood that proteins u and v interact. Experiments have confirmed that, for sparse protein interaction networks, this additional step of manifold-embedding has led to much better performance [92].…”
Section: Protein Interaction Databasesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A recent idea [42,92] to overcome this problem is using a larger interaction neighbourhood via a manifold embedding. Here, a protein-protein similarity matrix is first computed based on the shortest distancein terms of number of hops in the initial protein interaction network-between each pair of proteins.…”
Section: Protein Interaction Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ELM randomly chooses the input weights and bias, it only requires setting the number of hidden neurons and the activation function. In theory, ELM tends to provide the best generalization performance at extreme fast learning speed [18] [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%