2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10940-017-9338-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Longitudinal Self-Report Data to Study the Age–Crime Relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structure of the NLSY97 data collection, however, reduces these concerns by utilizing a detailed self‐administered questionnaire about sensitive topics, including criminal activity and criminal justice contact (Yan & Cantor, 2019). It is also reassuring that the reporting of arrest in the NLSY97 follows expected age‐graded arrest patterns in the general population, suggesting that criminal justice contact measures represent broader trends (Kim & Bushway, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The structure of the NLSY97 data collection, however, reduces these concerns by utilizing a detailed self‐administered questionnaire about sensitive topics, including criminal activity and criminal justice contact (Yan & Cantor, 2019). It is also reassuring that the reporting of arrest in the NLSY97 follows expected age‐graded arrest patterns in the general population, suggesting that criminal justice contact measures represent broader trends (Kim & Bushway, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This may omit relational ties established during this period of the life-course, which may be strong and potentially expose individuals to chronic and long-term patterns of psychological abuse. Second, this study examined violent offending during adolescence when offending risk is generally at its peak (Kim & Bushway, 2018;Liu, 2015). While examination of this outcome during adolescence is relevant, it is also important to examine continuity of this outcome into adulthood.…”
Section: Developmental Implications Of Psychological Domestic Abuse and Desistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hirschi and Gottfredson (1983) referred to the age–crime connection as one of the brute facts in criminology, given its invariance across time, geography, culture, social class, and a host of other factors. The relationship was first identified by the Belgian astronomer, sociologist, mathematician, and statistician Adolphe Quetelet (1796–1874) and has been a staple of criminological theory, research, and practice ever since (Kim & Bushway, 2018). The left arm of the age–crime curve normally begins in early adolescence, rising sharply over the next several years until it peaks in mid to late adolescence.…”
Section: Criminal Thinking and Criminal Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%