Using Leading Indicators to Improve Project Performance Measurement

Liu, Zheng; Baron, Christian; Esteban, Philippe; Xue, Rui; Zhang, Qiang; Yang, Shanlin

doi:10.1007/s11518-019-5414-z

Cited by 14 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, according to Zheng et al (2019), in project management the performance is measured by how the project has progressed, which does not help manage the project in the future. An interesting practice would be to use the indicators that can signal future events, helping the manager to monitor the project for goal achievement.…”

Section: Critical Success Factors and Project Management Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies such as those by Avileis et al (2018), Chen & Lee (2018), and Zheng et al (2019) show the need to analyze project management processes in order to create an evaluation structure aligned with continuous improvement. That being said, understanding the success of different projects and adapting models that can accurately measure their management and success is a complex and challenging task.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Study on the state of the art of critical success factors and project management performance

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article has carried out a state-of-the-art survey of the main international publications related to Critical Success Factors (CSFs) and project management performance from 2009 to 2019. The publications were extracted from the databases of the platforms Engineering Village, Web of Science and Scopus. In total, 77 works published in major international journals were selected for the bibliographic review. It was noted that the approaches that stood out in these articles are related to evaluation system, maturity analysis, types of strategies, use of management tools, and project governance process. The research has also identified 19 CSFs most cited in these publications and grouped them into categories. The results showed that a CSF related to human resources – team commitment – was the most cited in the publications. It is expected that the results of this work can contribute to the understanding, expansion and continuous enhancement of research in the field of project management. By producing a database of scientific works and presenting an overview of the needs and challenges that have to be overcome, it should also contribute to providing researchers with a theoretical background for further development in the field.

show abstract

Section: Critical Success Factors and Project Management Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on the state of the art of critical success factors and project management performance

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Studies such as those by Zheng et al (2019), Avileis Junior et al (2018, and Chen and Lee (2018) show the need to analyze project management processes in order to create an evaluation structure aligned with continuous improvement. That being said, understanding the success of different projects and adapting models that can accurately measure their management and success is a complex and challenging task.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The authors grouped CSF into five categories: 1) human resource factors; 2) organizational factors; 3) factors related to the relationship with the stakeholders; 4) project management factors; and 5) factors related to technical aspects. However, according toZheng et al (2019), in project management the performance is measured by how the project has progressed, which does not help manage the project in the future. An interesting practice would be to use the indicators that can signal future events, helping the manager to monitor the project for goal achievementsuch indicators are called main indicators Gunasekera and Chong (2018).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric Study of Scientific Research from 2009 to 2019 on Critical Success Factors and Project Management Performance

Pereira¹,

Novaski²,

Neto³

et al. 2022

GEPROS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This paper seeks to carry out a bibliometric analysis of scientific research available on the Web of Science platform and related to Critical Success Factors (CSF) and project management performance. Theoretical framework: This study is based on concepts related to project management, particularly Critical Success Factors and project management performance. Design/methodology/approach: To conduct this study, scientific publications were retrieved from the database on the Web of Science platform and analyzed. A statistical and content analysis was carried out using the VOSviewer free software and Excel sheets, as well as the WordArt website (www.wordart.com) to create a keyword cloud. Findings: Results show the importance of the subject matter, which was featured in a large number of publications from 2009 to 2019. Engineering sectors are the main areas that deal with it, especially by presenting models, implementing metrics, critical factors, tools and cases, which are used as a basis for performance studies. Data show that partnership networks need creating with greater integration, collaboration, and exchange between publications developed by researchers in Brazil. Originality/Value: By carrying out a bibliometric analysis based on Critical Success Factors and project management development, it is expected to help understanding and the development of studies and the continuous improvement of research into project management, as well as to contribute to the discussion of the quality of scientific research in the field. Keywords: Project management, Critical Success Factors, Project performance, Bibliometrics.

show abstract

“…Entretanto, de acordo com Zheng et al, (2019), no gerenciamento de projetos, o desempenho mede como o projeto progrediu mas não ajuda a gerenciar o projeto no futuro.…”

Section: Medida De Desempenho No Gerenciamento Do Projetounclassified

Identificação e hierarquização de variáveis de desempenho e sucesso nos projetos suportados por fundações de apoio

Souza Pereira

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ao Prof. Dr Olívio Novasky pela orientação e incentivos durante o percurso deste trabalho. Ao Prof. Dr. Dirceu Silva pelo uso correto das ferramentas estatísticas e a confiança transmitida no trabalho desenvolvido. Ao prof. Dr Max pela contribuição nas análises estatísticas. Ao Prof. Dr Welter Cantanhêde por ter conduzido o projeto DINTER/UFPI/UNICAMP com maestria e sagácia. Ao Prof. Francisco Pinheiro (in memorian) pela sua prudência, sabedoria e saudável convívio durante sua jornada existencial no CEP/UFPI. À CAPES pelo incentivo e fomento para formação dos professores da UFPI. À UFPI pelo investimento e incentivo na capacitação dos professores do CT e acreditar que a pesquisa é a solução para os problemas da sociedade, no desenvolvimento do estado do PI e do País.Aos professores do curso de Doutorado da UNICAMP (Olívio Novasky, Antônio Batocchio, Ruben Karan e Amauri Hassui) por proporcionarem momentos agradáveis de aprendizagem, trocas de experiências e novos conhecimentos.Aos colegas de doutorado do DINTER, principalmente, os professores Francismilton, Núbia, Firmo e Bruno pelo apoio e por compartilhar angústias provenientes do processo de doutoramento.Aos Doutorandos e Mestrandos da FEM/UNICAMP que me ajudaram e renovar meu espírito de pesquisador.Aos professores do Curso de Engenharia de Produção/UFPI pela colaboração, incentivo e espírito de equipe que torna a convivência no curso solidária e fraterna.Aos autores e referenciados nesta tese, assim como, os respondentes e as Fundações de Apoio que contribuíram para aquisição de informações e conhecimentos.Aos que torceram por mim, principalmente a minha família e amigos. "Bons amigos são como estrelas: nem sempre podemos ver, mas temos certeza que estão sempre lá" (provérbio de domínio público).

show abstract

Using Leading Indicators to Improve Project Performance Measurement

Cited by 14 publications

References 41 publications

Study on the state of the art of critical success factors and project management performance

Study on the state of the art of critical success factors and project management performance

Bibliometric Study of Scientific Research from 2009 to 2019 on Critical Success Factors and Project Management Performance

Identificação e hierarquização de variáveis de desempenho e sucesso nos projetos suportados por fundações de apoio

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About