Using Integrated Hands-on and Virtual Reality (VR) or Augmented Reality (AR) Approaches in Construction Management Education

Olbina, Svetlana; Glick, Scott

doi:10.1080/15578771.2022.2115173

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…71 Olbina and Glick applied VR and AR to the field of construction management education, and they found that VR performed better than AR regarding all measured indicators. 72 Another research group reviewed AR and VR applications in architectural design and proposed an alternative system including both AR and VR. 73 Much closer to the current topic, AR and VR environments were compared in the scenario of novices assessing building design.…”

Section: Comparing Xr Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Huang reviewed commercial hardware and software of VR and AR for AEC usage 71 . Olbina and Glick applied VR and AR to the field of construction management education, and they found that VR performed better than AR regarding all measured indicators 72 . Another research group reviewed AR and VR applications in architectural design and proposed an alternative system including both AR and VR 73 .…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparing three XR technologies in reviewing performance‐based building design: A pilot study of façade fenestrations

Zhao

Dong

et al. 2023

Computer Animation & Virtual

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Extended reality (XR), including augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), and virtual reality (VR), can make complex information more intuitively understandable. However, it still needs to be determined which XR technology is the most suitable for reviewing performance‐based building design, during which architects check whether design strategies increase energy efficiency, indoor environment quality and so forth. It requires comprehensive design and simulation information to be vividly represented. The authors develop three XR apps (AR, MR, and VR) to interactively visualize façade fenestration geometries and indoor illuminance simulations. Then XR technologies are assessed by 120 students and young architects, from task performance and engagement level two aspects. The task performance is measured by correct rate and time consumption two indicators, while the engagement level is measured by usability and interest two indicators. Evaluation results show that compared to AR and VR, MR is the best XR technology for this aim. VR outperforms AR on three indicators except for usability. By exposing three different XR technologies' performances in aiding fenestration design, this study increases the practical value of applying XR to the building design field.

show abstract

Section: Comparing Xr Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing three XR technologies in reviewing performance‐based building design: A pilot study of façade fenestrations

Zhao

Dong

et al. 2023

Computer Animation & Virtual

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The interactive features of AR can create a more stimulating learning environment and help learners get better learning outcomes [7]. The most popular fields for AR include construction and engineering education [8], [9], health education [10], [11], art education [12]- [14], and science education [15], [16]. These studies point to the potential of using AR in almost all areas of education [17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric analysis of augmented reality in chemistry education over the past decade

Juan,

DeWitt

2024

EduLearn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Numerous studies have delved into the application of augmented reality (AR) in chemistry education, focusing on specific topics, equipment requirements, and advantages. However, there remains a notable dearth of research examining the evolutionary characteristics of AR in this context. This study, employing bibliometric analysis on 66 articles spanning from 2012 to 2022, reveals that research primarily revolves around pedagogical approaches and AR technology development, particularly in kindergarten to 12th grade (K-12) education. Despite the United States exhibiting the highest publication frequency, there is a significant absence of studies addressing emotions, cognition, and physiological changes. Shedding light on these research gaps, this study underscores the need for further exploration into the cognitive, emotional, and physiological aspects of AR integration in chemistry education. Ultimately, the insights gleaned from this study offer valuable guidance for researchers, educators, and practitioners alike, facilitating the advancement and effective application of augmented reality in chemistry education (ARCE).

show abstract

Analyzing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) recent development in education

Al-Ansi

Jaboob

Garad

2023

Social Sciences & Humanities Open

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using Integrated Hands-on and Virtual Reality (VR) or Augmented Reality (AR) Approaches in Construction Management Education

Cited by 7 publications

References 31 publications

Comparing three XR technologies in reviewing performance‐based building design: A pilot study of façade fenestrations

Comparing three XR technologies in reviewing performance‐based building design: A pilot study of façade fenestrations

Bibliometric analysis of augmented reality in chemistry education over the past decade

Analyzing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) recent development in education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About