2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.10.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using injection molding and reversible bonding for easy fabrication of magnetic cell trapping and sorting devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CI-powder (44890, Sigma–Aldrich) used in this study had a particle size distribution of 5–9 μm, a density of 7.86 g/mL, and a purity of 99.5%, with a color that was pale to dark gray. The magnetic film was prepared by blending a specific ratio of PDMS solution (a 15:1 ratio of Sylgard 184A base to Sylgard 184B curing agent) (Royet et al, 2017). PDMS solution was next added at CI-powder-to-PDMS weight ratios of 2:1, 1:1, 2:1, and 4:1 (CI:PDMS), and was stirred thoroughly for 10 min until uniform.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CI-powder (44890, Sigma–Aldrich) used in this study had a particle size distribution of 5–9 μm, a density of 7.86 g/mL, and a purity of 99.5%, with a color that was pale to dark gray. The magnetic film was prepared by blending a specific ratio of PDMS solution (a 15:1 ratio of Sylgard 184A base to Sylgard 184B curing agent) (Royet et al, 2017). PDMS solution was next added at CI-powder-to-PDMS weight ratios of 2:1, 1:1, 2:1, and 4:1 (CI:PDMS), and was stirred thoroughly for 10 min until uniform.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, these DLD example devices possess an enrichment step and use multiple pumps [13] or have been tested to process up to 5 mL samples with a 91% targeted cell capture efficiency [14]. Microfluidic devices that make use of magnetic field gradients to enhance selectivity and increase throughput in cell separation and trapping applications have been developed [10,[15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As summarized in Table, 1, most of these magnetic separation microfluidic devices used sample volumes, ranging from a few μL to no more than 10 mL [16,17,19,20,[28][29][30][31]. For these volumes, relatively low flow-rates, typically less than 20 µL/s, were sufficient to achieve results in short time [15][16][17][18][28][29][30][31]. For example, Zanini, et al developed a microfluidic device with an integrated array of micromagnets with alternating polarities for the separation of magnetic nanoparticles, which resulted in > 94% particle capture efficiencies (with 0.25 µL/s flow rate) [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If simple and fast fabrication is required, additional PDMS-based magnetic strips in microfluidic devices could lead to enhanced magnetic cell separation [135]. An additional external rotating magnetic field can also be added for further mixing enhancement.…”
Section: Outlook On Magnetic Mixingmentioning
confidence: 99%