2002
DOI: 10.1080/09585190110102378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Hofstede's cultural dimensions to explain sexually harassing behaviours in an international context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the collectivist culture in Japan discourages women from reporting sexual harassment, so as to prevent the ostracism and shame that may accompany a personal lawsuit (Barrett 2004 ). Luthar and Luthar ( 2002 ) argued that differences in values infl uence men's likelihood to sexually harass across national contexts; men may be more likely to sexually harass in societies with low individualism, high power differentials, and high cultural masculinity. Shupe and colleagues ( 2002 ) examined the incidence and experience of sexual harassment among Hispanic women in the U.S., and found that risk of harassment increased with affi liation to the mainstream Anglo American culture.…”
Section: National Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the collectivist culture in Japan discourages women from reporting sexual harassment, so as to prevent the ostracism and shame that may accompany a personal lawsuit (Barrett 2004 ). Luthar and Luthar ( 2002 ) argued that differences in values infl uence men's likelihood to sexually harass across national contexts; men may be more likely to sexually harass in societies with low individualism, high power differentials, and high cultural masculinity. Shupe and colleagues ( 2002 ) examined the incidence and experience of sexual harassment among Hispanic women in the U.S., and found that risk of harassment increased with affi liation to the mainstream Anglo American culture.…”
Section: National Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…What may be considered harassment in one culture may be acceptable in another (Gee & Norton, 1999). Further complicating the issue is the presence of multinational corporations bound by laws of the parent country, but operating in the culture of the host country (Hardman & Heidelberg, 1996;Luthar & Luthar, 2002). More research is needed on the cultural relativity of sexual harassment (see, e.g., Gee & Norton, 1999).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hofstede's cultural dimension has been applied by many researchers in various fields, including psychology, to explain sexually harassing behaviours in an international context (DeSouza et al 1998;Kanekar and Dhir 1993;Luthar and Luthar 2002). It has also been applied in international management (Bing 2004), communication (Wardrobe 2005), marketing (de Mooij and Hofstede 2010), web designing (Marcus and Gould 2001), and a number of other disciplines and fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Values associated with long term dimension are thrift and perseverance; values associated with short term dimension are respect for tradition, fulfilling social obligations, and protecting one's 'face'. Finally, the collectivism versus individualism dimension refers to the extent to which someone values his/her own interest against the backdrop of the interest of the entire community (Hofstede 1980;DeSouza et al 1998;Luthar and Luthar 2002;Petrakis 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation