2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10672-006-9031-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parsing Work Environments Along the Dimensions of Sexual and Non-Sexual Harassment: Drawing Lines in Office Sand

Abstract: Laws addressing harassment at work have evolved considerably since court systems first recognized that (sexual) harassment is illegal. Now, managers must worry about protected classes other than sex (e.g., race, age, etc.), and the effects of harassment on bystanders as well as victims (i.e., ambient harassment). Understanding these newer conceptualizations of workplace harassment is critical for mangers dealing with an increasingly complex array of possible work environments, only some of which are illegal. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the invisibility of orientation, such ambient harassment may be particularly pervasive and problematic. Pesta, Hrivnak, and Dunegan () note that environments that may be “borderline” in terms of whether they constitute illegal harassment (such as when crude and unwelcome remarks are occasional but not pervasive) may certainly be perceived by individuals as harassment. Pesta et al refer to these as “powder keg” environments in that psychologically, individuals feel harassed even if the quantity of such behavior is not yet at a level to meet a legal standard of pervasiveness.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Sexual Orientation Harassmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given the invisibility of orientation, such ambient harassment may be particularly pervasive and problematic. Pesta, Hrivnak, and Dunegan () note that environments that may be “borderline” in terms of whether they constitute illegal harassment (such as when crude and unwelcome remarks are occasional but not pervasive) may certainly be perceived by individuals as harassment. Pesta et al refer to these as “powder keg” environments in that psychologically, individuals feel harassed even if the quantity of such behavior is not yet at a level to meet a legal standard of pervasiveness.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Sexual Orientation Harassmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bowes‐Sperry and O'Leary‐Kelly () proposed that observers are less likely to intervene when they are not confident that their definition of the situation is accurate. For example, Pesta et al () describe ambient harassment situations where an observer finds a behavior offensive, but the target seems not to react. Thus, we would expect observers to therefore remain uninvolved where the harassment does not seem meant to harm an individual and to become more involved when they have no doubts on harm being caused (see Major et al, , review).…”
Section: Prevalence Of Sexual Orientation Harassmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is necessary for employers to run an updated anti-harassment program with clear anti-bullying policy, an explicit statement of prohibited behaviors and a complaint procedure that encourages victims to come forward (Becton et al, 2017). It is also important that the anti-WB policy is clearly explained to employees and management acts in a timely and fair manner whenever complaints are filed (Pesta et al, 2007).…”
Section: What Recent Wb Research Concludesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rudeness and incivility are also inappropriate behaviors [29] [30]. Comments about a person's religious beliefs, sending offensive cartoons or pictures, and off-color or racist jokes are also forms of non-sexual harassment [31]. Certain managerial behaviors may also fall into this category, for example, asking for personal favors, unnecessarily switching assignment or equipment to penalize an individual.…”
Section: Non-sexual Harassmentmentioning
confidence: 99%