1998
DOI: 10.1080/13632469809350336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Gis in the Probabilistic Assessment of Earthquake Triggered Landslide Hazards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4) was used as a basis for regression analysis. We adopted Jibson's model considering: (a) this model has a quite simple form and proved to be more effective than the first formulation of the same author Jibson (1993) in that the logarithmic dependence from critical acceleration makes the estimation more stable, (b) the fact that they have been used in various contexts to assess and map regional seismic landslide hazards (e.g., Mankelow and Murphy 1998;Keefer 2000, 2001;Jibson et al 2000;Capolongo et al 2002;Refice and Capolongo 2002;Murphy and Mankelow 2004;Mahdavifar et al 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) was used as a basis for regression analysis. We adopted Jibson's model considering: (a) this model has a quite simple form and proved to be more effective than the first formulation of the same author Jibson (1993) in that the logarithmic dependence from critical acceleration makes the estimation more stable, (b) the fact that they have been used in various contexts to assess and map regional seismic landslide hazards (e.g., Mankelow and Murphy 1998;Keefer 2000, 2001;Jibson et al 2000;Capolongo et al 2002;Refice and Capolongo 2002;Murphy and Mankelow 2004;Mahdavifar et al 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a survey of recent applications of GIS to slopestability analysis, it is found that most researchers have concentrated on using a statistical method to quantify the relationship between slope failure and influential factors, whereas GIS performs regional data preparation and processing. Very little research has been conducted into the integration of GIS and the deterministic model for slope stability (Carrara 1983(Carrara , 1995Anbalagan 1992;Van Westen 1993, 1998Van Westen and Terlien 1996;Van Westen and others 1997;Mankelow and Mupphy 1998;Aleotti and Chowdhury 1999;Dai and Lee 2001). All slope failures have a 3-D geometry, which varies in space, even along a short distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast to deterministic analyses, expressing slope instability within a probabilistic or stochastic framework may involve the use of all data over a regional scale, especially geotechnical parameters, being defined as probability density functions (rather than single values). Probabilistic analyses were gaining more attention in hazard assessment of coseismic landslides due to model uncertainties and spatial variabilities of landslide-related parameters (Mankelow and Murphy 1998;Capolongo et al 2002;Del Gaudio and Wasowski 2004). On the basis of deterministic stability modeling, being an infinite slope model, a variety of well-established methods for probabilistic analyses, such as the first-order secondmoment (FOSM) method, the first-order reliability method (FORM), and Monte Carlo simulations, were useful for estimating the reliability of modeling and probabilities of seismically triggered landslides (Nadim et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%