2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2004.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using fuzzy MCDM to select partners of strategic alliances for liner shipping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
74
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is not feasible to rely on a single criterion for judgment. On the contrary, there is the need to consider a number of criteria characteristics, and in order to have an objective and fair decision-making process, the evaluation must rely more on FMCDM to achieve a good conclusion [3].…”
Section: The Research Framework Of Fuzzy Decision-making Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is not feasible to rely on a single criterion for judgment. On the contrary, there is the need to consider a number of criteria characteristics, and in order to have an objective and fair decision-making process, the evaluation must rely more on FMCDM to achieve a good conclusion [3].…”
Section: The Research Framework Of Fuzzy Decision-making Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pairwise comparison is used to calculate the relative importance weighing of each risk criterion with the incorporation of Fuzzy numbers to capture the subjective expert's judgments in the process. The output is a Fuzzy comparison matrix (Ding, Liang 2005;Xu, Chen 2007). …”
Section: Pairwise Comparison To Establish Fuzzy Comparison Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, TOPSIS is combined with fuzzy logic in order to eliminate the drawbacks of the conventional TOPSIS, which is well-known asFTOPSIS. This technique has been adopted in many different applications, includingservice quality (Buyukozkan, <;ifC;i, 2012;Awasthi,et al 2011a), strategic management (Ding. 2005;Kahraman, 2004;Kabak, 2012;Fu, 2007;Dagdeviren, 2009;Paksoy,et al 2011;, risk assessment (Braglia,et al 2003;Wang.…”
Section: Considered Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%