2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis to understand the role of technology in nursing education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the factors associated with food insecurity during COVID-19, the first-order structural equation modelling was applied. The structural equation modelling is a hypothesis testing method that states whether the indicators selected to measure latent variables are accurate (26) . Latent variables cannot be measured directly and must be figured out through observable variables that are directly measurable (27) .…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the factors associated with food insecurity during COVID-19, the first-order structural equation modelling was applied. The structural equation modelling is a hypothesis testing method that states whether the indicators selected to measure latent variables are accurate (26) . Latent variables cannot be measured directly and must be figured out through observable variables that are directly measurable (27) .…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development and technological innovation of the clinical information and communications technology sectors [2], new technologies have been examined and readily applied. Additionally, a study among nursing college students has shown that their perceptions toward these new technologies have been positive, with most (89.3%) perceiving the role of technology in nursing education to be positive [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EFA results of the rst phase of the investigation showed that the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value was 0.975, higher than 0.6, and the result of Bartlett's test was signi cant (χ2 = 46123.739, p < 0.001), both of which indicated a strong correlation among the items; the data were applicable for EFA [44,45].…”
Section: Exploratory Factor Analysis and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 91%