2017
DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using event related potentials to investigate visual aesthetic perception of product appearance

Abstract: Visual aesthetic directly affects the user's purchase decision and results from the user's analysis and judgment after perceiving product appearance. Therefore, understanding the neural mechanisms of visual experience is critical for product design. This study combined subjective evaluation with ERPs (event‐related potentials) to investigate the user's aesthetic experience as evoked by smartphones. A visual aesthetic scale was constructed, and the results from the questionnaire were used to verify the reliabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While these studies present evidence based on laboratory experiments with varying stimuli presentation times (e.g. presentation for 50-500 ms), recent studies looking at physiological data found different neural activation at 100 ms for aesthetically pleasant versus unpleasant interfaces after stimuli onset (Bölte et al, 2017;Ding et al, 2017), supporting that aesthetic processing occurs very early. Moreover, these initial decisions are manifested of being stable over time (e.g.…”
Section: The Interplay Of Aesthetics and First Impressionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…While these studies present evidence based on laboratory experiments with varying stimuli presentation times (e.g. presentation for 50-500 ms), recent studies looking at physiological data found different neural activation at 100 ms for aesthetically pleasant versus unpleasant interfaces after stimuli onset (Bölte et al, 2017;Ding et al, 2017), supporting that aesthetic processing occurs very early. Moreover, these initial decisions are manifested of being stable over time (e.g.…”
Section: The Interplay Of Aesthetics and First Impressionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Although subjective reporting is straightforward, it cannot elicit from subjects an immediate evaluation of the visual appearance of wood without requiring them to interrupt their appraisal and respond behaviorally. Moreover, subjective evaluation alone may not record subjects' real-time affect (Calvert and Brammer 2012;Ding et al 2017), rendering it difficult to understand the visual perceptual processing of wood appearance. This may be explained by the difficulty that subjects face in explaining their feelings clearly and completely when explicitly asked; their behaviors may be driven by subconscious processes (Calvert and Brammer 2012).…”
Section: Limitations In Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As different ERPs correspond to different brain locations, the occipital site, which was not related to the chosen ERPs (N100, P200, N200) used in our study was excluded from the analysis. According to related studies (Li et al 2015;Ding et al 2017), frontal sites and central sites were chosen for statistical analysis within the time window of 150-200 ms for N100 and 260-340 ms for N200, and the central-parietal site and parietal site were chosen within the time window of 200-260 ms for P200. Within each time window, the average potentials were fed into multifactorial repeatedmeasures ANOVAs with four factors: color (light-colored FE, medium-colored TG, or dark-colored JN), grain (radial, or tangential), gloss (matte, semimatte, or glossy), and site (frontal, central, central-parietal, or parietal site).…”
Section: Electrophysiological (Eeg) Recording and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N100 (Negative wave) 80-120 ms N100 is associated not only with the physical features in reflection to the attention level but also with the attractiveness of stimuli [78]. It relates to package design.…”
Section: P200 (Positive Wave) 150-250 Msmentioning
confidence: 99%