2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using environmental concentrations of cadmium and lead to assess human exposure and dose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicate that moss bags represent a means to extensively screen air pollution over large urban areas to obtain information on the time-integrated spatial distributions of particle-bound heavy metals and PAHs, demonstrating the moss bags' potential for epidemiological studies (Gailey and Lloyd, 1993;Hellström et al, 2004;Wolterbeek and Verburg, 2004).…”
Section: Moss Bag Technique As a Monitoring Approachmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The results indicate that moss bags represent a means to extensively screen air pollution over large urban areas to obtain information on the time-integrated spatial distributions of particle-bound heavy metals and PAHs, demonstrating the moss bags' potential for epidemiological studies (Gailey and Lloyd, 1993;Hellström et al, 2004;Wolterbeek and Verburg, 2004).…”
Section: Moss Bag Technique As a Monitoring Approachmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hellström et al concluded that for people close to a battery plant or factory, levels of heavy metals concentration in soil and moss could be a good diagnostic measuring tool [24]. Environmental exposure is measured by air, water, and soil pollution.…”
Section: Metals and Sight Organmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, short-term Cd exposure levels could also be important for studies of prenatal exposure and developmental effects in children. U-Cd concentrations have been shown to be correlated with age (Hellstrom et al 2004), sex (Hellstrom et al 2004), iron deficiency (Berglund et al 1994), parity (Åkesson et al 2002), smoking status (Hellstrom et al 2004; Ikeda et al 2005), secondhand smoke (Willers et al 2005), and dietary intake of Cd (Adams et al 2011; Choudhury et al 2001; Julin et al 2011; Shimbo et al 2000). However, most of these exposure studies have relied on single spot urine samples instead of repeated 24-hr urine collections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%