2014
DOI: 10.3233/jpd-140370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Ecological Whole Body Kinematics to Evaluate Effects of Medication Adjustment in Parkinson Disease

Abstract: Background: Functional motor impairments including mobility are major reasons for clinical intervention and medication adjustment in symptomatic therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). Outcome measures used to assess the impact of medication are mostly based on patients' memory or diaries which, considering the gaps between visits, are neither objective nor very reliable. Objective: Investigating the feasibility of using movement features extracted from ecological whole-body kinematics recordings to measure the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Restricted sit-to-stand (Si2St) task with feet fixed on the floor without any linear translation movement (Giuberti et al, 2015 ); extended TUG test (ETUG) with 10 m to walk and wide curve trajectory (Caldara et al, 2014 ); and Instrumented Stand and Walk Test (ISAW), which is a TUG in which the phase of standing up and sitting down are not included (Curtze et al, 2016 ; Horak et al, 2016 ), are variations on the traditional tasks. Alternatively, other works focused on gait tests on short (Esser et al, 2013 ), moderate (Schmidt et al, 2011 ; Arora et al, 2014 ), and long distance (Weiss et al, 2011 ), including 180° turns (Mariani et al, 2013 ; Rahimi et al, 2014 ); or straight walking at different speeds (e.g., comfortable, slow, fast) (Salarian et al, 2013 ; Del Din et al, 2016 ); or random walking with initiated stops and several 360° turns; or basic mobility-related activities (e.g., lying, standing) and domestic activities (Barth et al, 2013 ; Yoneyama et al, 2016 ). Only Barth et al ( 2011 ) and Oung et al ( 2015 ) proposed to analyse exercises able to assess foot mobility (e.g., heel-toe tapping or foot rotation), whereas, Parisi et al ( 2015 ) proposed a comparative outlook of different tasks: gait, sit-to-stand, and leg agility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restricted sit-to-stand (Si2St) task with feet fixed on the floor without any linear translation movement (Giuberti et al, 2015 ); extended TUG test (ETUG) with 10 m to walk and wide curve trajectory (Caldara et al, 2014 ); and Instrumented Stand and Walk Test (ISAW), which is a TUG in which the phase of standing up and sitting down are not included (Curtze et al, 2016 ; Horak et al, 2016 ), are variations on the traditional tasks. Alternatively, other works focused on gait tests on short (Esser et al, 2013 ), moderate (Schmidt et al, 2011 ; Arora et al, 2014 ), and long distance (Weiss et al, 2011 ), including 180° turns (Mariani et al, 2013 ; Rahimi et al, 2014 ); or straight walking at different speeds (e.g., comfortable, slow, fast) (Salarian et al, 2013 ; Del Din et al, 2016 ); or random walking with initiated stops and several 360° turns; or basic mobility-related activities (e.g., lying, standing) and domestic activities (Barth et al, 2013 ; Yoneyama et al, 2016 ). Only Barth et al ( 2011 ) and Oung et al ( 2015 ) proposed to analyse exercises able to assess foot mobility (e.g., heel-toe tapping or foot rotation), whereas, Parisi et al ( 2015 ) proposed a comparative outlook of different tasks: gait, sit-to-stand, and leg agility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, clinical scales and traditional patient‐reported outcomes continue to be the primary assessment tools or endpoints in PD clinical care and research. However, there is a growing awareness that TOMs may improve the sensitivity, accuracy, reproducibility, and feasibility of objectively capturing the full complexity and diversity of changes in motor and nonmotor behaviors . Examples include the difficulty to reliably evaluate fluctuating events (eg, the variable response to medication), to capture rare incidents (eg, falls or freezing of gait), or to assess behaviors that, by definition, take place over long periods of time outside the clinical examination room (eg, physical activities in everyday life).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FAB also collects foot sole pressure using weight-bearing insoles. This novel device was previously used to evaluate whole body mobility in Parkinson’s disease ( Rahimi et al, 2014 ; Rahimi et al, 2011 ), and velocity and range of motion in cyclists ( Corbett, Peer & Ridgel, 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%