2016 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/fit.2016.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Distributional Semantics for Automatic Taxonomy Induction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many research efforts have been devoted to the construction of taxonomies and folksonomies. Zafar, Cochez, and Qamar proposed a taxonomy induction system which was based on a word embedding trained from a large corpus [15]. Their research was based on the word2vec model and was focused on hyponym-and-hypernym identification.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many research efforts have been devoted to the construction of taxonomies and folksonomies. Zafar, Cochez, and Qamar proposed a taxonomy induction system which was based on a word embedding trained from a large corpus [15]. Their research was based on the word2vec model and was focused on hyponym-and-hypernym identification.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Word similarity methods usually represent each word as a vector and calculate the similarity between two words. In the method proposed by Zafar et al , each word is represented as a vector by word2vec model (Zafar et al , 2016). But this method requires large-corpus.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, word embeddings representations are involved in the task of knowledge hierarchical organization [6], [30], [8]. However, these methods are only considering hypernymhyponym relationship extraction between lexical terms, using word embeddings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the final step, the algorithm computes the transitive closure over all the previously extracted axioms (lines [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. We also make sure that there are no cycles in the final class hierarchy (line 34).…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%