2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using contingent valuation to estimate the willingness of tourists to pay for urban forests: A study in Savannah, Georgia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
39
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the few studies linking urban forests and tourism, Majumdar et al [77] concluded that for Savannah, Georgia, the better the urban forest, the more attractive the city is for tourists. This seems a reasonable conclusion considering that most city residents would like more trees and better urban-forest management in their own cities [27].…”
Section: A Suite Of Urban-forest Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the few studies linking urban forests and tourism, Majumdar et al [77] concluded that for Savannah, Georgia, the better the urban forest, the more attractive the city is for tourists. This seems a reasonable conclusion considering that most city residents would like more trees and better urban-forest management in their own cities [27].…”
Section: A Suite Of Urban-forest Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban trees, an important part of urban green infrastructure in providing ecosystem functions, are thus becoming increasingly important [1,2]. Previous research shows that urban trees can improve environmental quality [3,4], remove certain kinds of pollutants [5], change the appearance of the city [6], enhance public health and quality of life [7,8], meet the needs of public leisure and recreation [9], and provide a habitat for urban wildlife [10]. Previous research also suggests that urban trees could promote urban and community development and provide for a wide range of goods and services to the society [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest value was assessed for the component of water conservation and purification followed by the component of air pollutant absorption. Other important studies on the valuation of intangible benefits have been conducted, namely, to estimate water services in developing countries (Whittington et al, 1990); to estimate the recreational use value of forest resources of Kayabasi forest of Turkey; to value health effects of air pollution in developing countries (Alberini et al, 1997); to assess forest management strategies in urban forests of Georgia (Majumdar et al, 2011), etc. Besides, Costanza et al (1997) estimated the total annual value of the world's ecosystem services at an average of US$ 33 trillion, and of global forests at US$ 969 per ha.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%