Handbook of Qualitative Research Techniques and Analysis in Entrepreneurship 2015
DOI: 10.4337/9781849809870.00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using constant comparison as a method of analysis in entrepreneurship research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Valid critiques of qualitative research standards are also applicable to studies into entrepreneurship (see Neergaard and Ulhoi, 2007;Coviello, 2014). Weaknesses highlighted in the literature include lack of transparency; insufficient clarity on philosophical and methodological choices (Hlady-Rispal and Jouison-Laffitte, 2014;Van Burg et al, 2020); "quick and dirty reduction" of data (Smith et al, 2009, p. 82) during data analysis, and obscurity of data analysis procedures (Smith and McKeever, 2015). In addition, studies that focus on phenomenology do not always fully justify their position (see Seymour, 2006) or, in general, establish an informed rationale as to why they claim to be phenomenological or qualitative (Hlady-Rispal and Jouison-Laffitte, 2014).…”
Section: Critiques On Qualitative Research In the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Valid critiques of qualitative research standards are also applicable to studies into entrepreneurship (see Neergaard and Ulhoi, 2007;Coviello, 2014). Weaknesses highlighted in the literature include lack of transparency; insufficient clarity on philosophical and methodological choices (Hlady-Rispal and Jouison-Laffitte, 2014;Van Burg et al, 2020); "quick and dirty reduction" of data (Smith et al, 2009, p. 82) during data analysis, and obscurity of data analysis procedures (Smith and McKeever, 2015). In addition, studies that focus on phenomenology do not always fully justify their position (see Seymour, 2006) or, in general, establish an informed rationale as to why they claim to be phenomenological or qualitative (Hlady-Rispal and Jouison-Laffitte, 2014).…”
Section: Critiques On Qualitative Research In the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there is a tendency to perceive quality and validity of qualitative research from a positivist perspective (Smith and McKeever, 2015; Marshall et al , 2013) which restricts understanding of the importance and impact of qualitative research (Yardley, 2008). The conception that the meaning-making process is invisible in phenomenological research (Paley, 2017) is evident in some phenomenological enquiries into entrepreneurship (see section 4.3).…”
Section: Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurship Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Por ejemplo, combinamos una codificación abierta con una codificación axial posterior en la que establecemos relaciones jerárquicas entre las categorías. Asimismo, la construcción de estas categorías se ve influida por el método de comparación constante (Smith & McKeever, 2015) según el cual es necesario comparar los incidentes que van apareciendo en los datos con otros incidentes, estos con las categorías y, a su vez, las categorías con otras categorías. Por ejemplo, si observamos la primera red semántica (ver Figura 1) y revisamos la rama de la izquierda de arriba a bajo los diseñadores consideran que las experiencias de juego ofrecen una serie de posibilidades entre las cuales está la de generar aprendizajes actitudinales como, por ejemplo, la empatía.…”
Section: Metodologíaunclassified